This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Tree of Life This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Tree of Life, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of taxonomy and the phylogenetic tree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tree of LifeWikipedia:WikiProject Tree of LifeTemplate:WikiProject Tree of Lifetaxonomic

I have never seen this rank or taxon used formally. I really don't think it's standard, and I don't think we should treat it as such. As such, I'm removing the category for the time being, until the article has some substantitation. The systems above are all valid - though Archezoa is obsolete, and stole Chromista's color :) - except viruses definitely don't appear in the published versions of at least two. I'm not really sure what their point is, though. Josh 06:06, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)

"Biota" reminds me of kids who put "Earth, Solar System, Milky Way, etc" at the end of addresses. Anyway, we already have a long discussion on the various systems of kingdoms/empires/domains at Kingdom (biology). Gdr 23:24, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The taxon created by Walton in 1930 was actually called Bionta, not Biota. I have no idea who invented the other name. Vasconicus (talk) 05:53, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I believe these are distinct. Check the external links on this article, and you'll see "Biota" is listed, but "Bionta" is not. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:37, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bionta should probably be merged here, as a different name for the same concept. 76.66.193.224 (talk) 23:21, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Or maybe not... it could just represent all cellular life. 76.66.193.224 (talk) 23:37, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Biota (taxonomy). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100614111911/http://sn2000.taxonomy.nl:80/Main/Classification/1.htm to http://sn2000.taxonomy.nl/Main/Classification/1.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140115025557/http://taxonomicon.taxonomy.nl:80/TaxonName.aspx to http://taxonomicon.taxonomy.nl/TaxonName.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051222163318/http://sn2000.taxonomy.nl:80/Main/Classification/1.htm to http://sn2000.taxonomy.nl/Main/Classification/..%5CClassification%5C1.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140715055239/http://taxonomicon.taxonomy.nl:80/TaxonTree.aspx?id=1&src=0 to http://taxonomicon.taxonomy.nl/TaxonTree.aspx?id=1&src=0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]