This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC This article was accepted on 29 March 2014 by reviewer Libby norman (talk · contribs). Business This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. California This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Fashion This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Internet culture This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. WikiProject Internet culture To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles Expand : Pick an article from here or here Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images Stubs : All stubs are located here Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}} See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Product descriptions that have crept in appear to have a promotional tone in places and have been inserted by the original author of the article (I toned down before passing this through Afc). Language needs toning down and some of the statements are of questionable value and sound like marketing speak. Two examples that look a bit suspect are: 'Dress Pant Sweatpants...complete with pockets, belt loops, and even a zippered fly. However, instead of being scratchy and uncomfortable, they're made with soft French-terry fabric' and ' "(Cordarounds are) more aerodynamic," according to Chris Lindland, "You can get somewhere three nanoseconds faster in our cords than the traditional kind."'. Would also suggest that there is now an overuse of bullet points. In general, this needs to be returned to a more neutral writing style. The company is notable, and definitely good at attracting column inches, but this does not mean its Wiki page should be allowed to become an advert. Libby norman (talk) 09:19, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I flagged this back in April (see above) would suggest that some polite messages need to be sent to the people trying to convert this into a great big advert. Libby norman (talk) 22:55, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed this. Chisme (talk) 22:23, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]