This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: Antarctic Territory Low‑importance Australian Antarctic Division is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Australian Antarctic Territory work group (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Antarctica: Australian Antarctic Territory High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Antarctica, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Antarctica on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AntarcticaWikipedia:WikiProject AntarcticaTemplate:WikiProject AntarcticaAntarctica High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Australian Antarctic Territory work group (assessed as Low-importance).

A few years ago, Australian Antarctic Division was in the process of being renamed to Australian Government Antarctic Division, I assume largely to separate AGAD from private or commercial expeditions. Most things were changed, including the logo and web banners etc, all except the url aad.gov.au and an few other things. Now, it seems the DEWR has gone back on the name change and has reverted back to Australian Antarctic Division.

So my question, are they sticking with AAD? Should all AGAD references on WP be removed? Thanks. --Breno ^talk 09:12, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes we are officially back to AAD after a brief flirtation with AGAD. In so far as anything is certain in Government the change will be permenant so yes, all references to should go back to AAD. Gdenyer 09:21, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks. --Breno ^talk 11:59, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]