This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Islam Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Religious texts (defunct) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts

The same issue cropped up at the talk page of Iddah. Agree that "giving three commentaries on a single verse and not giving even a single commentary of other verses shows that article have undue weight." Especially when the same commentaries are mentioned multiple times in different sections. Recommend reduction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.37.157.231 (talk) 02:52, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you perhaps look at reducing the passage to some extent in that case? Could that help? --Tomb Blaster (talk) 05:32, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done--- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.37.157.231 (talk) 08:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly better. I'm not truly qualified to comment on the WEIGHT aspect which is separate from whether things are sourced. Either way what we have now is better than a blanket revert. --Tomb Blaster (talk) 16:13, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]