Talk:Archaeology
Archaeology was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This level-3 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Make Archaeology Good Again
This article used to be a good article. Let's make it like that again. Who's In?
𝒞𝑜𝑜𝓅𝑒𝓇 𝒢𝑜𝑜𝒹𝓂𝒶𝓃 (talk) 02:20, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Votive site article
Greetings, The Votive site article lacks references since it was created in 2004. Asking for help here as I'm not familiar with the topic. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 12:04, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Done - Thank you User:Joe Roe for redirecting to Votive offering article. Cheers! JoeNMLC (talk) 14:00, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Slavery in Latin America
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 August 2023 and 16 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Michaelmccalla (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Michaelmccalla (talk) 00:21, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Egyptology
While we don't want the article (in particular, the historical part) to be too long, shouldn't we include the work of Napoleon's savants, like Denon? Kdammers (talk) 16:51, 8 February 2024 (UTC)