This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Plants Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

• ... that Aquilegia moorcroftiana is named after a mountaineer and is found at the highest elevation of any species of columbine?

• Reviewed: 1.) Template:Did you know nominations/Man of Smoke, 2.) Template:Did you know nominations/Skin of My Teeth
• Comment:

Pbritti (talk) 00:27, 9 December 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Hook eligibility:

• Cited:
• Interesting:
• Other problems: - I would suggest changing the sentence in the article "named for William Moorcroft" to "named after William Moorcroft" to make the wording clearer, and likewise for the hook.

Overall: This is my first review so I would like a second opinion. jolielover♥talk 16:02, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• • @Jolielover: Thanks for the review—how fun that this was your first. Welcome to the club! I think that "named for" is an Americanism and "named after" is the preference in British English; as the most relevant Engvars in this case would be British, Pakistani, or Indian English, I've adopted the suggested phrasing. By my estimation, I think your review is decent, but let me know if you want any clarifications! ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:33, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Pbritti: Thanks for the feedback, I actually had no clue it was a variation in English so sorry about that! jolielover♥talk 03:37, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • @Jolielover: Neither did I. Thanks for the review; consider keeping this on your watchlist in case someone has some insights for you to keep in mind in future reviews! Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:40, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        • Providing that second opinion - article is on time, appropriate length, well cited. No apparent copyvio concerns from online source, AGF on offline sources. Think this is good to go! - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:22, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]