This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by the politics and government work group. Pakistan Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Pakistani politics. Women's History This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Can someone of those who are removing the {{autobiography}}, {{refimprove}} templates please explain the reason for it. The autobiography tag was added because the article is written in non-neutral language by an editor having a similar username as the subject. And per the Verifiability policy of Wikipedia that requires the information added in articles must be verifiable in the form of an inline citation to a Reliable Source, the second tag was added. But both of these were removed persistently by some IP editors and Munir hussain1, so I do like to hear your view about this. -- SMS ^Talk 10:03, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Pak research: Discuss the issue here instead of reversions and calling up unspecified Wikipedia policies.  samee  converse  14:59, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Samee, please read the body of article, and see that the claimed title does not match the content given in the body of the article, so it is against BLP policy as not being a verifiable content. IHC has nowhere ruled anywhere this assertion claimed in this unknown webpost. Thank you. 27.^ "Lawmakers deliberately amended Khatam-e-Nabuwwat clause to benefit Ahmadis, rules IHC". Daily Pakistan Global. Retrieved 30 July 2018.

Dear Samee, please see the article printed in The News on this issue: " https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/341416-khatam-e-nabuwwat-declaration-ihc-hasn-t-held-anyone-responsible-for-amendment. Thank you

• Special:Contributions/Mhasan.nitb
• Special:Contributions/GOP_MOITT
• Special:Contributions/Pak_research Saqib (talk · contribs) 09:18, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]