This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ecology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. Environment Mid‑importance This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The 'Recent research' of this article doesn't sound reliable - I don't think that recent research about alpha diversity is limited only on these four people, and together with missing notes about historical perspective this sounds more like personal advertisement... arne 09:12, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly agree. This article could be improved by anyone even slightly knowledgeable on the subject (which doesn't include me, alas). 86.0.204.154 (talk) 00:13, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How about rolling alpha, beta and gamma diversity into a single article? Richard001 09:13, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, this page as written isn't about alpha-diversity -- only the first section is. Gafox1 (talk) 19:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All the diversity indices could be eliminated from this page, as they are already treated in pages of their own. I think this page should just contain the description of what alpha diversity is and how it relates to and differs from beta and gamma diversity. I'm planning to take the page towards that direction soonish but will wait to see if someone objects first. Cricetus (talk) 21:15, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alpha diversity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060228212753/http://www.uwsp.edu/geo/faculty/heywood/geog358/Diversity/Biodiversity.htm to http://www.uwsp.edu/geo/faculty/heywood/geog358/Diversity/Biodiversity.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:36, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]