This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Alfredo Simón → Alfredo Simon – Reason: His name is pronounced in the American/English manner with no emphasis on the "o" in Simon. Therefore the article on Simon should be titled "Alfredo Simon". However, Alfredo Simon redirects to Alfredo Simón. That is why I need assistance for making this move.BeenChanged (talk • contribs) 20:56, 12 April 2012 (UTC) orig. timestamp 20:28, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, I don't think the addition or removal of diacritics can be categorised as "uncontroversial" in the present climate. IMO, this needs to go to a full discussion. Jenks24 (talk) 20:38, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Can you present any evidence that he doesn't use the accent mark? Or someone opposed to the move present evidence that he does? – Muboshgu (talk) 18:17, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What he uses is irrelevant. What WP:RS use (you know, the one's that establish his notability for us to even have an article about him) to refer to him is what matters. --Born2cycle (talk) 01:30, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - sorry, but until he takes US citizenship he is still Alfredo Simón, he is still Dominican, and his main notability outside baseball (regrettably) relates to the incident in Luperón, Puerto Plata, also outside USA. As Jenks alludes to above there is an ongoing tension between "sports sources" and encyclopedic style (cf. Chicago Manual of Style etc.) on Wikipedia, but generally with BLPs, BLPs respect the nationality of living subjects, as illustrated by WP:UE and WP:OPENPARA. Note also that the assumption that Spanish diacritics can't be used of sportspeople if they get a green card to play in America isn't so true today - see [the unfortunate Fox News story which is titled "Alfredo Simón, Baltimore Orioles Reliever.." and text has "1 Feb 2011 – Baltimore Orioles pitcher Alfredo Simón, right, here being ejected in a game in September, was ..." so really the normal WP:BLP demand for accuracy trumps the fact that US sports websites don't usually respect Spanish names. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:16, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If it did, but it doesn't. Please see the article which already has WP:RS which document the spelling and the lede line already reflects the correct spelling, as does the title. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:02, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- I could not find a single English WP:RS that used diacritics when referring to him (e.g., the NY Times). We should follow usage in reliable sources, not invent a "right" way that contradicts usage in English reliable sources. --Born2cycle (talk) 01:26, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Move to regard Born2cycle as unqualified to comment on RMs involving typography, since he has declared his extreme prejudice against, and ignorance of, the value of typographical correctness here. Dicklyon (talk) 18:57, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I see no compelling evidence that the unaccented version is correct, as English language RS's don't always use them, as In ictu oculi demonstrated. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:02, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
X
Diese Website benutzt Cookies. Wenn du die Website weiter nutzt, gehe Ich von Deinem Einverständnis aus.OKNeinDatenschutzerklärung