This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latvia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latvia related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatviaWikipedia:WikiProject LatviaTemplate:WikiProject LatviaLatvia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Notability tag
I have removed the baffling notability tag added by User:Clearfrienda, clearly without understanding the article history, including the deletion review at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 November 18 and the AFC review by User:Iwaqarhashmi. It is baffling that an article approved via the AfC process, which includes an independent examination of notability, would be so tagged; any editor who disagrees should take this to AfD immediately, drive-by tags lacking WP:BEFORE are of no value. BD2412T14:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@BD2412: Why do you believe the subject is notable? He doesn't meet GNG or ANYBIO — the only thing I could see is WP:NPROF criteria #1 but that's weak at best. I did, actually, do a WP:BEFORE review and I reviewed both the deletion review and the prior AfD. No need to make assumptions. In my opinion, I don't think article should've been accepted out of AfC (especially considering the stricter criteria). I was considering nominating this for deletion but the potential "significant impact in their scholarly discipline" made me hesitant, which is why I tagged it and left it for another reviewer. CFA💬15:03, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Clearfrienda: The subject has published more than thirty articles with 100+ citations, with nearly 15,000 total citations. That is far above "significant impact in their scholarly discipline" (WP:AUTHOR criteria #1, "regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers), even without the GEBN article, publication of a reviewed book for popular consumption, and various other mainstream media references. BD2412T15:16, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Diese Website benutzt Cookies. Wenn du die Website weiter nutzt, gehe Ich von Deinem Einverständnis aus.OKNeinDatenschutzerklärung