This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Agriculture Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Chemicals Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Environment Mid‑importance This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

How is it possible to have at the same time "Homologuation in Europe requires [...]" (present tense) and "[...] is banned in Europe since 2006" ?

http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/02/13/france-pesticides-monsanto-idINDEE81C0FQ20120213

I have restored some information deleted by Jytdog. Please see his comment:

12:23, 10 June 2013‎ Jytdog (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (6,422 bytes) (-80)‎ . . (→‎Safety: deleted "In a judgment that could lend weight to other health claims against pesticides" - this is not in source and editorializing.) (undo | thank)

However, the source exactly states in "a judgment that could lend weight to other health claims against pesticides". I restored that information. Gandydancer (talk) 23:41, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

so it does. thanks for catching that - that was a bad mistake on my part Jytdog (talk) 01:22, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's certainly hard to understand how it could be missed since the statement is the very first sentence of the source article. I also note that Formerly 98 added a citation needed tag to the info re the EU ban even though the source says "Monsanto's Lasso was banned in France in 2007 following an EU directive after the product had already been withdrawn in some other countries". While that source may not be good enough for you and Formerly, I think that most people would accept it. At any rate, I found another source and removed the tag. Gandydancer (talk) 10:40, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah i know, first sentence. i generally skip the lead of news stories as it repeats what is below. but yeah i missed this. good catch.Jytdog (talk) 20:25, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I was unaware of this lawsuit, and this Talk page exchange. Fascinating, in light of subsequent events. Jusdafax (talk) 11:35, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]