This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC This article was accepted from this draft on 24 December 2023 by reviewer Ozzie10aaaa (talk · contribs). Engineering Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Astronomy: Solar System Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Solar System task force. Spaceflight This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Women scientists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. India Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Several sections of the article do not follow Wikipedia's neutral writing guidelines. For example, consider the following:

"She motivates millions of young students all over the world by sharing her journey as an immigrant on a visa in the United States, on Instagram, and persevering in the face of obstacles to achieve her dreams of working on space projects at NASA. Her goal is to "inspire 1 million people to dream big and live their best lives".

This clearly reads like the person's autobiography. Sufficient secondary sources are lacking for this person. Overall the article reads like a Linkedin profile page and not a Wikipedia article. Mosana2300 (talk) 09:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to remove the WP:PROD template as this is not an uncontroversial deletion. There are WP:RS in this article. You could improve the article by removing any WP:NPOV issues you find in it but the article isn't overall written in such a manner. An alternative would be to elicit discussion with WP:AFD. However, given that you just created your account I encourage you to do some productive edits on Wikipedia articles and better learn policies before proceeding further with this. Regarding a potential AfD discussion, I don't think this article meets WP:NACADEMIC but in my estimation would meet WP:GNG. Nnev66 (talk) 13:54, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]