Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SCB '92 (talk • contribs • count) 13:56, 8 September 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   the "even" in "and even from Mendoza, Argentina" doesn't sound neutral; maybe "also" is a better word to use? the quotes should close by having the speech marks inside the full stop, not outside, so some of the quotes in the article close correctly, while others don't; needs to be fixed; also, most dates have [date] before [month] eg. 2 June, but the last sentence reads "September 18", needs to be swapped around. Also, "the book" is used twice at the start of a sentence in the last paragraph; paraphrase to "it". doesn't "states it was built between 1904 and 1906" need a "that" after states"?

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   "The restoration of the cultural centre prompted the creation of an independent organization called the Corporación Cultural de Pichilemu (Pichilemu Cultural Corporation)" is a one-sentence paragraph; either combine with previous paragraph or expand? also "Its director is María Angélica Yáñez Cortés" is a short sentence that also needs to be combined or expanded

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   references dates differ, eg. some use "2009-02-01", others use "24 July 2011"; and change ref#8 from "Septiembre" to "September"; references need to be consistent

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   no problems here

   C. No original research:

   no problems here

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Organization section opening could be longer, as well as Public library subsection; but not that serious.

   B. Focused:

   definitely focused

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   totally neutral

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   none whatsoever

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   all public domain

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   all neccessary

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   I'm sorry, but the article has its issues that'll take a while to fix