This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Environment Low‑importance This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... I cut out much of the promotional content and attempted to create a more neutral tone. It doesn't seem purely promotional anymore, at least to me. I haven't dug into the sources to verify, but there seem to be enough sources that the company is not unambiguously non-notable. The CSD nomination was certainly reasonable, but I think the article no longer satisfies the criteria for speedy deletion. --Mark viking (talk) 22:05, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In attempting to find sources to see if this article meets the WP:GNG, I've found a bunch of coverage of complaints about how it's trading carbon credit. I don't have chance to integrate these into the article now, but they should be included since it seems at least as significant as the company's F1 sponsorship. I've added a couple of citations below:

• Nereim, Vivian (June 28, 2013). "Carbon credit buyers file formal complaints against UAE firm". The National. Dubai. Retrieved December 28, 2024.
  <ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thenational.ae/news/uae-news/environment/carbon-credit-buyers-file-formal-complaints-against-uae-firm|title=Carbon credit buyers file formal complaints against UAE firm|last=Nereim|first=Vivian|date=June 28, 2013|work=[[The National (Abu Dhabi)|The National]]|location=Dubai|accessdate=December 28, 2024}}</ref>
• Danaher, Simon (June 10, 2013). "Dubai carbon credit firm accused of being a Ponzi scheme". International Adviser. Last Word Media. Retrieved December 28, 2024.
  <ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.international-adviser.com/news/middle-east/dubai-carbon-credit-firm-accused-of-being|title=Dubai carbon credit firm accused of being a Ponzi scheme|work=International Adviser|publisher=Last Word Media|last=Danaher|first=Simon|date=June 10, 2013|accessdate=December 28, 2024}}</ref>

—me_and 13:36, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Advanced Global Trading. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120628070703/http://www.ameinfo.com/273275.html to http://www.ameinfo.com/273275.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130601032506/http://lotusf1team.com/-agt-.html to http://lotusf1team.com/-agt-.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:19, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]