This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Buddhism Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Architecture This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Nepal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Citizendium Porting (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Citizendium Porting, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Citizendium PortingWikipedia:WikiProject Citizendium PortingTemplate:WikiProject Citizendium PortingCitizendium Porting

Just so you know, this is not a copyright infringement. -- Taku (talk) 23:53, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just figured that out and reverted back to the pre-tagged (both my own and CorenBot) version, sorry about the confusion. - 2 ... says you, says me 23:54, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine. I have edited the whitelist of CorenBot; so we shouldn't have the same problem (misidentified copyright infringement) in the future. -- Taku (talk) 00:00, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]