This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Royalty and Nobility This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance). Poland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Google books result :Dukes of Cieszyn = 1400-1920 = 3 books

1400-1945 = 20 books, 1960 = 44, 1980 =104, 2008=200 books

Google book result :Dukes of Teschen 1400-1945 = 798 books, 2008 = 858 books

Duke of Cieszyn by 1920 = result 3 books,

1945 = 20 books, 2008 = 200 books

Despite that there were no Dukes of Cieszyn until after 1920/1945, and the name Duke of Teschen is the correct one, a group of people at Wikipedia [1], [2] want to force recently invented names, such as Dukes of Cieszyn on the public, insinuating, that this is the long established correct name

Teschen and Duchy of Teschen on 1600s Map of Duchy of Silesia with Teschen in Duchy of Teschen An Observer (71.137.197.97 (talk) 16:25, 13 October 2008 (UTC))[reply]

I support observer and urge Wikipedians to reconsider usage of Teschen/Cieszyn in English texts on history of the dukedom.--Qasinka (talk) 16:49, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adam Wenceslaus, Duke of Cieszyn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140316080356/http://wwperson.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/cgi-bin/l3/LANG=engl/F=Adam@Wenzslaw/N=v.Schlesien-Teschen/Q=D:13.7.(1617/1618) to http://wwperson.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/cgi-bin/l3/LANG=engl/F=Adam@Wenzslaw/N=v.Schlesien-Teschen/Q=D:13.7.(1617/1618)

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]