Talk:Ad fraud
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 July 2020 and 28 August 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ReinaChanel.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:51, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Requested move 8 September 2018
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Consensus to not move, therefore, not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 21:04, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Ad fraud → Advertising fraud – "Ad" is an informal abbreviation. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:16, 8 September 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 22:24, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Per WP:CONSISTENCY with Ad blocking, ad rotation, et cetera, et cetera. I did, however, make the suggested move location into a redirect, since that makes sense.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 23:21, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Nom has not provided a clear policy-based reason to support the proposed move. "Ad fraud" is widely used in reliable sources. AusLondonder (talk) 02:06, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment @LaundryPizza03: I would like to see some Gbook evidence please. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:34, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Legality
The article doesn't say anything about the legality of ad fraud. Information about this would be relevant. Is it legally considered fraud, or is it just a jargon term (in the way that "piracy" isn't actually piracy)? Have there been legal cases in this area?--Exjerusalemite (talk) 21:23, 4 June 2019 (UTC)