This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Royalty and Nobility This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility. India: Karnataka / History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

I understand that one doesn't have to log in for editing. If so how come Kannambadi removed brief information on Achyutadevaraya , Viswanatha Naidu and Sevappa Naidu and name of the reference book ? If he did remove on the grounds of myself not logging in I request him to enlighten me on this matter since logging is not mandatory as per the talk page guidelines I believe . Please let me know if I am missing something.

Logging in is not mandatory, but adds credibility to your edits. Just because one does not have to log in does not mean one can abuse the facility. This is why wikipedia administrators use locks, to lock up articles constantly being edited by anonymous editors. Anon edits are akin to vandalism, even if done in good faith and accompanied by reference books and citations. Logging in is a courtesey on wikipedia, that all wikipidinas should practice, so their content can be considered valid. If you have any doubts, please contact an admin and he will advice you. Thanks youDineshkannambadi 02:39, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]