This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Cryptocurrency Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptocurrency, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cryptocurrency on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptocurrencyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptocurrencyTemplate:WikiProject CryptocurrencyWikiProject Cryptocurrency Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

This seems ripe for abuse. If their service supports 25 cryptocurrencies, what's the rationale for listing 7 of them? It should either be the full list, or none at all, instead of letting people choose their favorite cryptocurrency to add to the list. In any case, I suggest removing this partial list from the article lead, and if relevant, the full list can be added in the article body. Thoughts? --Btcgeek (talk) 03:08, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Haven't looked at sources in detail, however a majority are either primary sources or from unreliable crypto outlets like CoinDesk, Cointelegraph, and Bitcoin.com. Without those, seems like notability would be harder to establish without further discussion. At the very least, significant portions of the article should be trimmed with unsourced and unverifiable claims removed. In addition, the intro and some other statements read as promoting Abra's products/services and should be reworded, statements with undue weight evaluated. ^Hidden_{Lemon /}^{/ talk} 20:46, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]