This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lepidoptera Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lepidoptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of butterflies and moths on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LepidopteraWikipedia:WikiProject LepidopteraTemplate:WikiProject LepidopteraLepidoptera Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Australia: New South Wales / Queensland / Tasmania / Victoria / Biota Low‑importance Abantiades hyalinatus is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Tasmania (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales, or the State Library of Victoria, or the State Library of Queensland, or the State Library of Tasmania. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

I'm getting a 404 - file not found for this article's only reference. I've tried correcting it, but I can't find any info on the family at all on the source site. Rich^(Contribs)_{(Talk to me!)} 07:42, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I was getting my taxonomy mixed up. Found it now. Rich^(Contribs)_{(Talk to me!)} 07:45, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]