This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook Environment This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 September 2020 and 16 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Eelb723.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This page needs some serious work. The massive block of text needs to be edit down and rework to make it more smooth reading. -ChristopherM 05:40, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The page still needs work. I've expanded the summary of the book, but it's scandalous that a work of this importance has not attracted more contributors from the massive scholarly community who emphasize Leopold's work. Among things that would be a nice would be some discussion of the controversy over the philosophical pedigree and interpretation of Leopold's land ethic, as well as, perhaps, the debate among environmental ethicists about Leopold's credentials as an original philosophical voice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomp649 (talk • contribs) 16:47, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sand county almanac.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:25, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That text was copied directly from http://www.treelink.org/woodnotes/vol2/no1/sandcnty.htm by 140.209.61.217 so I removed it. -ChristopherM 00:15, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 13:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't hard to find articles that say the book is notable:
http://www.nytimes.com/1999/11/13/opinion/a-sand-county-almanac-at-50.html NY Times article from 1999 titled A Sand County Almanac at 50 If A Sand County Almanac were not notable, the NY Times wouldn't be writing about it 50 years after it was published.
http://www.pcdf.org/Meadows/leopold.html "The book was little noticed until twenty years later, during the environmental awakening of the 1970s, when a paperback edition turned into a surprise best-seller."
"Rachel Carson" By Lisa H. Sideris, Kathleen Dean Moore Page 96 The authors point out that "A Sand County Almanac" was an important influence on Rachel Carson. They also point out that the book attracted "overwhelming attention from environmental philosophers as a source of information and ideas".
"Silent Spring" and "A Sand County Almanac": The Two Most Significant Environmental Books of the 20th Century Nature Study, v44 n2-3 p6-8 Feb 1991 "The histories, similarities, and differences between these two books are discussed. Reasons for their importance to the environmental movement are proposed. Lists of additional references are included." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.69.13.170 (talk) 01:42, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:A Sand County Almanac/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Last edited at 20:44, 10 May 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 06:20, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A Sand County Almanac. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://web.mac.com/jaginsburg/germtales/Sand_County_Almanac.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070607141634/http://www.donmeredith.ca/Outdoorsmen/SandCounty.html to http://www.donmeredith.ca/outdoorsmen/SandCounty.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:56, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]