Moved to Talk: Walker (Star Wars)

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Star Wars This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Star Wars, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Star Wars saga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Star WarsWikipedia:WikiProject Star WarsTemplate:WikiProject Star WarsStar Wars WikiProject Star Wars To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Assess : Tag the talk pages of Star Wars-related articles with the {{WikiProject Star Wars}} banner. Update the classification of articles in Category:Unassessed Star Wars articles and Category:Unknown-importance Star Wars articles. Citing sources : Jedi, Sith Cleanup : Remove any In-universe information at Category:Star Wars articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction. Copyedit : Under Early Life. Fix grammar of "towns (plural) predominantly Protestant technical college" to "town's (possessive)..." Stubs : Category:Star Wars stubs Other : * See the things to do page Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability

Wierd thing with these: The article mentions them being six-legged, and Battlefront II does as well, but all the shots from the movies clearly show them as having a mere *four* legs. The models in Battlefront II actually had six legs, with two more flexible ones inbetween the front and rear sets. The comment about them not being easily transportable, and their unwieldy six-legged design, is actually taken from Battlefront II if I recall. But all the movie screenshots clearly show an armor plate where the other two legs are in Battlefront II...wierd. -Graptor — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.161.204.180 (talk • contribs) 09:56, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Watched Epi II again to check this out. Turns out they *do* have six legs in the movie, just the picture has a crummy angle on it. The leg in the picture that appears to be the rear leg is in fact the middle leg, just the angle on the shot is such that it's both blocking the view of the rear leg and the back half of the vehicle! Not only that, but the front right leg is blocking the view of the rear left, and the entire front of the vehicle is blocking the view of the entire rear half of the one behind it! You can see the left rear leg if you look *very* closely, and the half AT-TE visible on the far right clearly has three legs showing. Looks like, overall, it's just a bad picture. Probably ought to be replaced, as it gives the impression that the things are about half the size they actually are, based on what is visible, and manages to give the impression that they've only got four legs instead of six. This is why I check these things. -Graptor

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.161.206.154 (talk • contribs) 12:37, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No one cares to mention how this is clearly an inefficient, impractical, and simply idiotic design? Haizum 05:58, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Out of universe criticism of the concept needs to be sourced and from a neutral point of view. — Deckiller 18:52, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The comment left in French reads:he was invented and conceived by the kaminoan for the war of the clones and was conceived into many specimen although expensive C an excellent vehicle of assautl like transport --Pupster21 Talk To Me 12:06, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(refers to this --EEMeltonIV 12:10, 26 September 2007 (UTC))[reply]