This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
QPQ: - missing Overall: I've done some copyedits, and I think in that regard it's ready for the main page. I've changed the heading name of the "commentary" section to "analysis", since the other word struck me as odd. Issues that remain are: An undated sentence with a comparison ([...] which is less than the 30% percent previously); I've put a "when" template after it. And ofc, a QPQ is missing. –LordPeterII (talk) 18:49, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@LordPeterII: Hi, thanks for the comments. Just did the QPQ. I am happy with your changing of the "commentary" section title, but could not find the date for "less than 30%" which I don't think should not be serious for DYK nomination. Mainly because it is supported by a reliable source after all. --Mhhosseintalk06:15, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Mhhossein: Hmm, it wasn't a major issue, but it's a silly thing to have in an article. If we have a statement that something improved or worsened, it only makes sense if we give a timeframe for the comparison. If I were to write "life expectancy in Germany has doubled, compared to before", I can rather think people want to know when that "before" was: The Middle Ages, or the 1990s? ;) Anyway, I followed the link in the Al Jazeera source, and it brought me to the other one where the 30% were written. I put the dates in the article. Since that was the remaining issue, I can
Hi @Mhhossein: - thanks for your message. I wouldn't really set it as directly related, though. This was a well defined series of protests in October, specifically about the cost of living, and it sort of fizzled out by November as I understand it. The recent ones are a new set of strikes and protests, about the different (albeit vaguely related) area of pension reform. It seems like this may become a series of protests too, and for which the other article is similarly structured with a timeline and suchlike. I haven't seen reliable sources linking the two as a single series, and I don't see much merit in duplicating information across both, it risks becoming a multiyear patchwork of mostly unrelated things. Particularly so when we already have the wider Protests against Emmanuel Macron article which summarises this and the other one on a single page already. Cheers — Amakuru (talk) 13:20, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]