This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Disaster management Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Earthquakes Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Earthquakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of earthquakes, seismology, plate tectonics, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EarthquakesWikipedia:WikiProject EarthquakesTemplate:WikiProject EarthquakesWikiProject Earthquakes Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Mountains Mid‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Climbing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climbing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climbing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ClimbingWikipedia:WikiProject ClimbingTemplate:WikiProject ClimbingClimbing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Nepal Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Tibet Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. China Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The article currently has the death toll ranging from 17 up to 24. How many people were actually killed? I think the lede's figure of 22 is the closest to accurate (18 on the mountain, 1 from injuries in hospital, 3 trying to fix the route through the icefall). Is an incomplete list of 17 of those people necessary? How on earth did NatGeo come up with that 24 figure? NekoKatsun (talk) 15:37, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the title plural? Only 1 avalanche is reported in the sources on Mt Everest itself, From Pumori into the basecamp on Mt everest. Other avalanches are reported on other nearby mountains in the sources. There may have been other avalanches on Mt Everest, but there are no reports of the avalances.

--Jcardazzi (talk) 19:07, 21 July 2015 (UTC)jcardazzi[reply]

There was the avalanche that took out the attempt at repairing the route through the icefall? Would that count? NekoKatsun (talk) 19:19, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean NatGeo relaying this Facebook post, is a Facebook post considered a reliable source? Are there any other sources videos etc, verifying the statement in the post?

“Sadly, three more Sherpas died in the Icefall, trying to repair the damaged route,” mountaineer Elia Saikaly wrote on Facebook. “There was a subsequent avalanche that took out most of the ladders in the Icefall.” --Jcardazzi (talk) 19:38, 21 July 2015 (UTC)jcardazzi[reply]

That number includes three Sherpa who perished in the Khumbu Icefall after the initial earthquake. An aftershock caused at least three more avalanches on Sunday. Those Sherpa were part of a government team who fix the route between base camp and Camp I, where 60 climbers had been trapped by the first earthquake. http://www.macleans.ca/news/world/eyewitness-to-disaster-on-the-top-of-the-world/ Note that these events would be distinct from the initial one that came off of the saddle between Pumori and Lingtren, which are West of the Icefall. 66.96.79.214 (talk) 22:46, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

.. is somewhat odd at the moment. It's not alphabetical by first or last name. Instead, there's 'the most famous to Americans' one, a Google exec first. The next two are also American, then there's a list of Nepalese people, then another American.. who is also listed as Vietnamese, then two more. The presumably unintended implications are that Americans are the most important people to die.. but an American with Vietnamese heritage isn't quite the same thing. Lovingboth (talk) 11:17, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]