This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cheshire Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cheshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CheshireWikipedia:WikiProject CheshireTemplate:WikiProject CheshireCheshire Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Architecture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Historic sites Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why is 2-18 St Werburgh Street, Chester a redlink? A number of other redirects could likely be made, too. Gene Nygaard (talk) 15:26, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The dash is an en dash per MoS as in 2–18 St Werburgh Street, Chester. But I take your point about redirects - will do some. Peter I. Vardy (talk) 16:07, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, so that is a range of house numbers; I couldn't imagine what it might be, though maybe it was something like dots on the line in British model numbers for aircraft and weaponry. What a weird thing to have in an article's title! Doesn't anybody there have enough sense to give this shopping area a real name? Yes, it definitely needs a redirect; though it is a little hard to imagine anybody entering a range of house numbers and a street name in any format and expecting to find an article in Wikipedia. Of course, there is also the British English "St" which should include "St." redirects as well. Gene Nygaard (talk) 20:35, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The row of shops plus bank does not have a name, and never has had one, so I could not think of an alternative; and that's what the source material uses anyway. The "St" redirect has already been done (with hyphen and with en dash). Peter I. Vardy (talk) 17:08, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]