1913 Studebaker strike has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result October 21, 2021 Good article nominee Listed
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 6, 2021. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the 1913 Studebaker strike is regarded as the first major labor strike in the automotive industry?
	A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 17, 2023.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Organized Labour Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Michigan: Detroit Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Detroit task force. Automobiles Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:1913 Studebaker strike/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 19:39, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be taking a look at this! — GhostRiver 19:39, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

• "manufacturing plant. Thus the police banned large marches and parades." → "manufacturing plant and a subsequent city ban on large marches and parades."
  • Done.
• "began hiring replacement workers - strikebreakers" → "began hiring strikebreakers"
  • Done.

• "were not long-lasting." → "were short-lived"
  • Done.
• "responding to requests from autoworkers in the city" → "in response to seveal requests" (decrease repetition of "autoworkers in the city")
  • Done, with grammatical fix to "several".
• Subject/verb agreement with the quote: the city was "among", but is only one "metropolis"
  • Fixed.
• "IWW organizers began focusing their efforts"
  • Done.
• "with the organizers initially pushing for" → "who initially pushed for"
  • Done.
• The last sentence has a semicolon where there should be a period
  • Fixed.

• "(AFL,)" → "(AFL),"
  • Fixed.
• "craft union oriented" → "craft union-oriented"
  • Fixed.
• Unpaired right parenthetical after "at odds with the IWW"
  • Fixed.
• Commas around "presided over by Robbins"
  • Done.

• "organized labor at Detroit" → "organized labor in Detroit"
  • Done.

• Good

• Both photos are in the public domain and are relevant to the article
• I'd recommend moving the first one up a paragraph to avoid disrupting the header line, per MOS:IMAGELOCATION
  • Done.
• No stability concerns in the revision history
• Copyvio score looks great at 10.7%

Putting on hold now to allow nominator to address comments. Feel free to ping me with any questions. — GhostRiver 19:58, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GhostRiver, just pinging to let you know that I made some edits to the article that address your comments. Thank you for starting this review, and if there are any further questions, comments, or concerns about the article, please reach out. -JJonahJackalope (talk) 20:09, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Made one additional edit myself; otherwise, looks good to pass! — GhostRiver 21:27, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]