This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

New York City Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Historic sites Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Architecture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Skyscrapers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	14 Wall Street has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result May 11, 2020 Good article nominee Listed
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 23, 2020. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that 14 Wall Street in Manhattan was among the first skyscrapers to use a pyramidal roof?

I had edited in that floors 32-37 are located within the pyramid roof and are only used for storage but it was removed for lack of citation. How am I supposed to cite something like that? Other than say a few photographs showing that 31 is the top floor and 32-37 are actually within the pyramid, I can't think of any public document that would contain this. Overall a trivial detail, but I think it should be noted that while the building contains 37 floors (38 including elevator lift room) only 31 are useable. Drumz0rz (talk) 17:27, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, we cannot accept information that you are personally aware of that can't be corroborated with a citation from a reliable source. That's because all information must be verifiable by other editors, and they cannot do so if there's no citation. You'd be surprised, though, at what kinds of information is out there, so I suggest you try a Google search and see what comes up. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:56, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:14 Wall Street/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 03:30, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1. Prose ✓ Pass

2. Verifiability ✓ Pass

3. Depth of Coverage ✓ Pass

4. Neutral ✓ Pass

5. Stable ✓ Pass

6. Illustrations ✓ Pass

7. Miscellaneous ✓ Pass

1.

• Would it be appropriate to link Venice? Venice is fairly well known, but some readers may not know where Venice is.
  •  Done
• Is there a way to gloss what a tempietto is? It's not a well-known architectural feature, and typing the phrase in the searchbar redirects to a specific example.
  •  Done
• Link granite
  •  Done
• "the street than did the original building,[4] In addition to an entrance" - I believe that should be a period, not a comma.
  •  Done
• "The "express" elevators that ran nonstop from the lobby to serve the upper floors while the "local" elevators served the lower floors and the "relief" elevators served all floors." - Remove the word "that"
  •  Done
• J. P. Morgan is a duplink
  •  Removed
• "the trust leased the Stevens Building for 84 years. at a cost of $1.5 million." - the period after years shouldn't be there
  •  Done

2.

• Publication date for the MTA map (Ref 6) should be 2015 I believe - that's the date on the map.
  •  Done
• Some issues with Ref 90 (The NY Post archive) - First, there should be a $ in the title instead of the %. Second, the archive linked to has some markup code instead of the article below the NY Post header (the page appears to have been down during the web crawl), but the archive snapshot before the current one does work (use the arrows at the top by the dates)
  •  Done I also found the current page location, so it is a live link now. epicgenius (talk) 13:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Ref 101 needs the publication date.
  •  Done

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

• Should the note about the floors be noted in the infobox too, since it's placed in the lead and the first mention in the text, or would that cross the line into clutter in your view?
  • No, I think this would be fine. epicgenius (talk) 13:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Placing on hold, just a few things to tidy up. Hog Farm (talk) 04:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good work. Passing. Hog Farm (talk) 15:27, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]