This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Internet Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Africa Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www..slideshare.net
  • In .africa on 2011-05-20 21:40:57, Encoding Error: UnicodeError (label empty or too long)
  • In .africa on 2011-05-31 13:13:27, Encoding Error: UnicodeError (label empty or too long)

--JeffGBot (talk) 13:13, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not surprised that this horrible article hasn't even been changed to show that this domain is now live and in the root zone. It's an incredible quagmire reflecting the legal mess surrounding delegation of this gTLD.

I propose that this entire article be moved to something like "History of .africa" and a new article be created that looks like most of the other TLD articles in existence. (Then the "history" article will need to be thoroughly edited, but that's not something I have the skill, patience or expertise to do.) If there is no objection posted here, I'll try and come back next week and take a stab at it.

--Craig (t|c) 09:48, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the history should be extracted to another page and the article made consistent with other TLDs. Most of the history is also captured in the ICANN Wiki. - Wachunga (talk) 18:12, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I added a little bit more useful information in the beginning of the summary. Less political and more substantive to what the TLF is. FreddyDVO (talk) 01:26, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. It's too much. A rambling dense text on the legal issues surrounding the domain. It needs to be moved and thoroughly edited. MarshallMolasses (talk) 19:27, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]