This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Novels: Fantasy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Fantasy task force. Children's literature Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Tasks you can do: Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks. Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles. Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}} Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project. Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects. Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject. References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs. Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature Stubs: Improve a stub-class article Women writers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Warriors Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Warriors, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Warriors, Seekers, Survivors and Bravelands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WarriorsWikipedia:WikiProject WarriorsTemplate:WikiProject WarriorsWarriors Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. WikiProject Warriors tasks you can do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Every book in the main arcs of Warriors, Seekers, Survivors, and Bravelands, an article for the Bamboo Kingdom series Expand : The Sun Trail, Kate Cary, Cherith Baldry, Victoria Holmes, Wayne McLoughlin Wikify : Starlight (novel), Twilight (Hunter novel), Sunset (novel), Long Shadows (Hunter novel), Sunrise (novel)

I just noticed, why's the cover for The Sight have the kits with all amber eyes? On the copy I've got they're what their eye colors really are. I wonder why they've changed it...? (Nyctra 15:21, 2 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Well, there are two different covers. One has the correct eye colors while one has a different one.Nightflower 22:06, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, could someone change it to the correct cover? I don't know how to...205.121.201.180 17:52, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first edition cover then you have to leave it as is. If you want to have the other cover you could add in a sentence or two about it, but it's really unecisary to have both the covers or to change them.  Bella Swan_(Talk!) 17:02, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A play has been released on warriorcats.com that 'insinuates' that *gasp* Leafpool was pregnent and that one of the three kits may be her's NOT Squirrelflight's! I don't know if I should put up anything about it here or not ~Rainclaw (NOT Rainpaw) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.247.1.36 (talk) 21:03, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing has ever pointed towards the play as being canon, so we have chosen not to add information from it, because it just seems so unlikely, and it hasn't been confirmed to have actually occured.

Besides that, it's not relevant to this page anyways. --~|ET|~(^{Talk|Contribs}) 21:40, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PowerofThreebook1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:24, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed it. ~ Bella Swan 22:31, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...And another question: why are there two story summaries in the article?? Extremely perplexing.... ♣ Bishop Tutu ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 00:53, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So do you want the 'Summary' section deleted? It doesn't add much to the article. Shrewpelt (talk) 03:03, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Shrewpelt (talk) 01:55, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article is too long, and the plot summary looks like it's been taken directly from the inside cover of the book.

I'll cut down when I get home...IceUnshattered (talk) 14:10, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone notice that Firestar was a bit lazy when deciding wether to make Graystripe deputy again or let Brambleclaw remain deputy? I mean, come on, Firestar said that he "owes Graystripe so much" and that he trusts him more than anyone, but the last thing the clan needs is more change so Brambleclaw remains deputy. He may as well have said "I think Graystripe is the rightful deputy, but i'm too lazy to go through the ritual again so Brambleclaw will remain the deputy". Does anyone else agree that they could have come up with a better reason to keep Brambleclaw as deputy?

--The Lord of the Allosaurs (talk) 12:38, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brambleclaw knows the territory better than Graystripe. And a lot of warriors, like Dustpelt, Mousefur, Spiderleg, etc, are already questioning Firestar, with his constantly taking in outsiders, etc. Brambleclawx 20:48, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So on Warriors: Power of Three#The Sight, I noticed that the plot summary for The Sight is almost a word-for-word copy of the plot summary here. Should the summary in Warriors: Power of Three be shortened? Let me know your thoughts. – Ben79487 (talk contribs) 01:07, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]