This  level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Video games: Nintendo High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Nintendo task force. Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks: 2010s High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: http://www.usgamer.net/articles/the-usgamer-staff-shares-their-finals-thoughts-on-e3 Edge #296 p.74-85 Interview on Waypoint (rebooted Vice Magazine gaming site) http://www.lemonde.fr/pixels/article/2017/01/21/jeux-video-legend-of-zelda-breath-of-the-wild-sera-un-moment-cle-dans-l-histoire-de-la-saga_5066750_4408996.html http://www.digitaltrends.com/gaming/zelda-hd-rumble/ http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/292776/Forging_Zeldas_future_by_revisiting_its_past.php https://www.nintendo.co.jp/character/zelda/productionnote/index.html Franzese, Tomas. "'Ghost of Tsushima' gameplay can't live up to 'Breath of the Wild' for 1 reason". Inverse. https://www.polygon.com/2017/3/13/14912864/breath-of-the-wild-review-jim-sterling-opinion (better to use secondary source) http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/06/22/why-miyamoto-didnt-want-to-call-zelda-breath-of-the-wild-an-open-world-game see links in Legacy discussion below https://web.archive.org/web/20170517093347/http://www.gameinformer.com/b/features/archive/2017/03/23/the-legend-of-zelda-breath-of-the-wild-amiibo-done-right.aspx http://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/the-dazzling-reinvention-of-zelda https://www.famitsu.com/news/201709/03141030.html https://www.famitsu.com/news/201708/31140870.html https://kotaku.com/nintendo-powers-first-podcast-episode-dishes-on-breath-1821501678 Black Gate (magazine): https://www.blackgate.com/2017/06/22/delivering-on-the-promise-of-a-true-open-world-the-legend-of-zelda-breath-of-the-wild/ Houghton, David (2017-03-24). "Zelda: Breath of the Wild's climbing is the secret ingredient that finally adds real adventure to open-world gaming". Gamesradar+.

I feel as though the VP update for the article is appropriate. Anyone have a good narrative with citations?

"Diving Beasts" in 2nd paragraph of "Plot" should be "Divine Beasts", the name of the game concept. Invisibilibuddy (talk) 17:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 17:56, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The "Plot" section of this article was rewritten on October 30, 2024. Although there's nothing wrong with this inherently, the rewrite was riddled with typos, grammatical errors, and confusing language; while many of those errors have been fixed in subsequent edits, I don't think the synopsis needed to be rewritten at all; the old synopsis is closer to the one by which the article was given good article status in 2018 (Old revision of The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild).

The errors can be corrected, but I think we need to decide whether to keep the synopsis from before the rewrite, or after. — gabldotink [ talk | contribs | global account ] 16:48, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted the synopsis to the original. — gabldotink [ talk | contribs | global account ] 21:02, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]