Talk:The Gateway Pundit
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Failing? And Supreme Court decision
See [1]. Doug Weller talk 07:35, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Bull Pucky
The Gateway Pundit (TGP) is an American far-right fake news website. The website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories. 68.229.190.208 (talk) 22:38, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yes indeed. That's what reliable sources say. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 23:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- The title of the thread suggests that you want to include "bull pucky" to the list of things GP publishes. That would be true but redundant, unencyclopedic, and unsourced. --Hob Gadling (talk) 06:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate/redundant sections
There is a section under History on "2020 election lawsuits." And there is a section under False Stories on "2020 election." Now I have added a paragraph on Hoft's admission/apology under "2020 election lawsuits." But it seems like these two sections are duplicating. Maybe History and False Stories sections should be merged and made chronological. — goethean 15:18, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia should be objective
Starting the article with the sentences "The Gateway Pundit (TGP) is an American far-right fake news website. The website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories," is not an objective statement. More objective would be: "The Gateway Pundit (TGP) is an American far-right news website considered by some as having controversial content. Readers of traditional media may consider TGP as publisher of fake news, including hoaxes, falsehoods and conspiracy theories. However, some readers of TGP consider its content more reliable than that of the mainstream news." 97.73.100.23 (talk) 03:51, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — Newslinger talk 03:57, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
considered by some as having controversial content
Why not "allegedly considered by some as having what some sources call controversial content"? --Hob Gadling (talk) 09:16, 27 December 2024 (UTC)- Some readers believe the Earth is flat. It isn't. O3000, Ret. (talk) 20:49, 27 December 2024 (UTC)