Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Talk:Bukkake


Move/merge request

At the top of the article, there's a link to the disambiguation page. On that page there are two items: a) food and b) Facial (sex act). There is no link back to this page. So I suggest the following changes:

  • remove all food references on this page to a separate page, maybe in the form "main article see..." or whatever you prefer. I don't think lengthy references to Japan food belong to pages about sex.
  • merge this page with Facial (sex act), or, if you think it's not the same, then instead add on the disambiguation page at least a link back to here, so that there are three items

Independent of the above, how I understand it, it's the Facial, not what is depicted here in the first image with multiple men. This is causing confusion. So this should be clarified. This article caused more confusion than helping to understand. --84.72.19.114 (talk) 09:11, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for bringing this up. I agree that the disambiguation page is unhelpful, and, as far as I can find, "bukkake" is never used to refer to facials in general, so the link to Facial (sex act) was inappropriate. I've replaced our "hatnote" (the link at the top of the page) with one that mentions the sole ambiguity (pasta), and I've proposed the disambiguation page for deletion.
Also, it doesn't matter, but, at the time you saw the disambiguation page, it did have a link back to this article—the first word of the first sentence: Bukkake is a group sex act in pornography.  Rebbing  talk  06:00, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bukkake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:17, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Change to lead

@Flyer22 Reborn: - I am not yet auto-confirmed so cannot edit this article, but would you make a change on my behalf, or at least I invite discussion on the proposed change:

The lead currently reads:

Bukkake (Japanese: ぶっかけ, [bɯkkake] ⓘ; English: /bʊˈkækeɪ/ buu-KAK-ay[1]) is a sex act portrayed in pornographic films, in which several men ejaculate on a woman, or on another man.

I propose a change to read the inserted bold text, or at least a variant of it. The current lead makes an explicit claim, whereas Bukkake exists outside the porn film world as well - ie in real life. Or indeed the simple removal of "portrayed in pornographic films," which would then leave the remainder of the sentence to be inclusive of all situations.

Bukkake (Japanese: ぶっかけ, [bɯkkake] ⓘ; English: /bʊˈkækeɪ/ buu-KAK-ay[2]) is a sex act sometimes/often/which may be portrayed in pornographic films, where several men ejaculate on a woman, or on another man.

Comments and thoughts from others? Curved Space (talk) 07:55, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Curved Space, other than the Etymology section, the sources only seem to be discussing this act within a pornography context. I understand that it can happen outside of pornography, as is the case for any sex act that is possible in real life, but do you have access to any solid sources discussing this outside of a pornography context? For sex acts that are mainly, or seemingly solely, portrayed in pornography, we should be clear about that as early as possible instead of making the act appear common in the general population. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 09:23, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

____

References

  1. ^ "bukkake". Oxford Dictionaries. Oxford University Press. Retrieved 7 September 2015.
  2. ^ "bukkake". Oxford Dictionaries. Oxford University Press. Retrieved 7 September 2015.

Semi-protected edit request on 30 January 2019

It is my suggestion to encourage healthy debate regarding lesbian bukkake. I feel as if, though it is not necessary to wade into the 'urine or no debate', we should approach the matter of fair descriptive reference and give those who do activate their skene's gland their dues and put to the rest the issue of 'but it's interchangeably mixed!' to bed. We know it comes out of the vagina not the urethra. Refinement of liquid via tissue filtration may cause a problem for some who smell with their brains sometimes but it's a mind over matter kind of deal.

Belief that women are pissing on each other misses out on the fundamental form of life and the pre-existing properties from when it was ejaculated. 86.29.220.66 (talk) 18:02, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. DannyS712 (talk) 19:37, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 October 2019

Bukkake does not mean several men ejaculating on a person, it means when a mans semen is bright white and foamy 74.138.225.172 (talk) 07:56, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Needless to say, a request to change established claims is not actionable without references.  Spintendo  14:51, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Male viewers' motivation

The section can be merged with Reception because it is rather short (one para), repeats some claims made in Reception, specifically about the practice being a form of humiliation, and generally is similar in scope to Reception Leoseliv (talk) 23:53, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quelle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3ABukkake