Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mudder: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Implementer (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*'''Delete''', does not warrant its own article. [[User:Atari2600tim|Atari2600tim]] 02:47, 23 July 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''', does not warrant its own article. [[User:Atari2600tim|Atari2600tim]] 02:47, 23 July 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''', childish unencyclopedic. [[User:Robotmannick|Robotmannick]] 02:57, 23 July 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''', childish unencyclopedic. [[User:Robotmannick|Robotmannick]] 02:57, 23 July 2005 (UTC) |
||
--[[User:Implementor|Implementor]] 17:19, 24 July 2005 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' or redir to [[MUD]]. User also created [[Mudders]] [[User:Eclipsed|Eclipsed]] 17:35, 24 July 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' or redir to [[MUD]]. User also created [[Mudders]] [[User:Eclipsed|Eclipsed]] 17:35, 24 July 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''', I think it's a bit psychological. I like that. |
|||
Revision as of 17:55, 24 July 2005
- Keep, I vote it stays as well; what a concise article! -- Implementor 13:18, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep,If this doesn't belong in an Encyclopedia, then neither does MUD, GNS Theory or anything that defines anything about roleplaying games. I vote it stays. -- Anonymous
This doesn't really belong in a encyclopedia Bobbis 21:43, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, silly, unencyclopedic. Tempshill 22:08, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, any non-silly content could go in MUD anyway seglea 23:10, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, does not warrant its own article. Atari2600tim 02:47, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, childish unencyclopedic. Robotmannick 02:57, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete or redir to MUD. User also created Mudders Eclipsed 17:35, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, I think it's a bit psychological. I like that.