User talk:Slugger O'Toole: Difference between revisions
Moneytrees (talk | contribs) 8 |
Moneytrees (talk | contribs) →Archiving note: Replying to Slugger O'Toole (using reply-link) |
||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
::Yep, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Slugger_O%27Toole&diff=967158168&oldid=967156777 I’ve fixed it]. I archived the thank you post to test it out and it went to the right place. I’ll move the Braincua1 talk page to your 8th archive. [[User:Moneytrees|Moneytrees |
::Yep, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Slugger_O%27Toole&diff=967158168&oldid=967156777 I’ve fixed it]. I archived the thank you post to test it out and it went to the right place. I’ll move the Braincua1 talk page to your 8th archive. [[User:Moneytrees|Moneytrees |
||
:::{{u|Moneytrees}}, Terrific. Thanks! I've noticed the same problem at [[Catholic Church and HIV/AIDS]]. Think you could work your magic there? -- [[User:Slugger O'Toole|Slugger O'Toole]] ([[User talk:Slugger O'Toole#top|talk]]) 13:55, 11 July 2020 (UTC) |
:::{{u|Moneytrees}}, Terrific. Thanks! I've noticed the same problem at [[Catholic Church and HIV/AIDS]]. Think you could work your magic there? -- [[User:Slugger O'Toole|Slugger O'Toole]] ([[User talk:Slugger O'Toole#top|talk]]) 13:55, 11 July 2020 (UTC) |
||
::::I looked into it, it seems like an issue with the OneClickArchiver; It doesn't count "Aids" as part of the title due to the slash. I'm not sure how to fix that issue, so I just decided to move the contents of the malformed archive to the correct one. My advice would be not to use OCA on that page; I would suggest going to the script creator, but they've been arb banned. There's some stalkers on the [[User talk:Technical 13/Scripts/OneClickArchiver|scripts talk page though]], so maybe dropping a note there will be useful. [[User:Moneytrees|Moneytrees |
Revision as of 21:17, 11 July 2020
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 7 sections are present. |
I've nominated Käte Frankenthal for DYK
Hi. I've nominated your article at DYK. You can see the nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Käte Frankenthal.
The nomination has run into a concern with close paraphrasing. Can you please take a look and address those concerns?
Sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:36, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
July 2020 at Women in Red
![]()
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Category:Seaport District has been nominated for deletion
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c1e4/7c1e48f4faebb0ffdf3780546b753e70aff51a4d" alt=""
Category:Seaport District has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 06:22, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Please undo the archiving
Please undo the archiving you performed. I believe it gives a skewed view of the conversation and forces me to repeat points I have already made to you. AlmostFrancis (talk) 18:55, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- AlmostFrancis, Could you be a little more specific? I only archived conversations that have gone dormant for a month or more. I also left some that have not had any further commentary in more than a month but are directly relevant to other conversations (e.g. RfCs). If you tell me which you would like restored, I'd be glad to do it. Alternatively, you can restore any of them yourself if you want to continue a line of discussion. I think the real solution here is to set it up so that the archiving is done automatically. I'll work on that. -- Slugger O'Toole (talk) 18:39, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- You archived two sections about sectioning right around the time you asked a question that had been answered ad nauseum. Is this your statement that you will not undue the archiving?AlmostFrancis (talk) 00:15, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- AlmostFrancis, No. That is not what my statement said at all. In fact, I said the exact opposite. However, I don't think it benefits anyone to have 40 dormant sections on the talk page. Again, if you tell me what sections you would like un-archived, I would be glad to do it. I also encourage you to be bold and do it yourself. -- Slugger O'Toole (talk) 13:03, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- You archived two sections about sectioning right around the time you asked a question that had been answered ad nauseum. Is this your statement that you will not undue the archiving?AlmostFrancis (talk) 00:15, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Daniel Slattery house for deletion
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c1e4/7c1e48f4faebb0ffdf3780546b753e70aff51a4d" alt=""
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Slattery house is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Slattery house until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Can you confirm if this house is a contributing property to Dedham Village Historic District, the boundaries which appear encompass it?Djflem (talk) 19:46, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Archiving note
Whenever you archive something using OneClickArchiver, it gets archived to User talk:Briancua 1. I'm assuming this is unintentional? MoneytreesTalk
Help out at CCI! 18:38, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- Moneytrees, It is unintentional, but I am not sure how to fix it. Do you? -- Slugger O'Toole (talk) 13:34, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Yep, I’ve fixed it. I archived the thank you post to test it out and it went to the right place. I’ll move the Braincua1 talk page to your 8th archive. Moneytrees
Talk
Help out at CCI! 13:53, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Moneytrees, Terrific. Thanks! I've noticed the same problem at Catholic Church and HIV/AIDS. Think you could work your magic there? -- Slugger O'Toole (talk) 13:55, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- I looked into it, it seems like an issue with the OneClickArchiver; It doesn't count "Aids" as part of the title due to the slash. I'm not sure how to fix that issue, so I just decided to move the contents of the malformed archive to the correct one. My advice would be not to use OCA on that page; I would suggest going to the script creator, but they've been arb banned. There's some stalkers on the scripts talk page though, so maybe dropping a note there will be useful. Moneytrees
Talk
Help out at CCI! 21:17, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- I looked into it, it seems like an issue with the OneClickArchiver; It doesn't count "Aids" as part of the title due to the slash. I'm not sure how to fix that issue, so I just decided to move the contents of the malformed archive to the correct one. My advice would be not to use OCA on that page; I would suggest going to the script creator, but they've been arb banned. There's some stalkers on the scripts talk page though, so maybe dropping a note there will be useful. Moneytrees
- Moneytrees, Terrific. Thanks! I've noticed the same problem at Catholic Church and HIV/AIDS. Think you could work your magic there? -- Slugger O'Toole (talk) 13:55, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Yep, I’ve fixed it. I archived the thank you post to test it out and it went to the right place. I’ll move the Braincua1 talk page to your 8th archive. Moneytrees