An article that you have been involved in editing, Scott Lake, Thurston County, Washington, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Lake, Thurston County, Washington. Thank you. Deor (talk) 03:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We seem to have forgotten to welcome you. Please check our guide to writing Wikipedia articles, and our list showing all the things to do here. I don't think your first article will stand, but I hope you continue working here and finding somethin more substantial for an article--it was a good try, but the subject just isn't notable. See WP:N for a guide to what sort of things are more suitable for an encyclopedia. DGG (talk) 04:31, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Scott Lake, Thurston County, Washington. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Deor (talk) 05:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to the page Scott Lake, Thurston County, Washington constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Versus22 _talk 05:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Scott Lake, Thurston County, Washington. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Versus22 _talk 05:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Scott Lake, Thurston County, Washington. Versus22 _talk 05:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want the article to be deleted (and assuming that you, when not logged in, are the IP editors who have contributed to the article), you might try inserting the template {{db-author}} at the top of the article. Deor (talk) 05:46, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Useight (talk) 07:04, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to the page Speed of light appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 07:33, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Orders of magnitude (temperature), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Furnace Creek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vashon Glaciation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington State. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:19, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Appple. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Appple. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Late Cenozoic Ice Age, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calabrian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Antarctic Treaty System into Crime in Antarctica. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:35, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The copied content has been removed from the Crime in Antarctica page. More specific and relevant content to crime in Antarctica is being added. - Appple (talk) 02:15, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Tasmanian Passage.

A New Page Patroller Boleyn just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 17:25, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Appple. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Appple. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vashon Glaciation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calabrian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you add a link of Crime in Antarctica to article Pole of Inaccessibility (Antarctic research station)? Neither article mentions a 'crime' at the station. Is it possible you meant to add the link to a different Antarctic-related article? Shenme (talk) 22:51, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I just remembered an Antarctic joke Shenme (talk) 22:55, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Boffin latest

Arrests were made after an argument over stolen cake led to a fight

among scientists studying sea birds on an Arctic island, in a

muffin stuffing Baffin puffin boffin biffing cuffing.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rocky Prairie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rosa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rocky Prairie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prunella (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rocky Prairie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hesperia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frost fair (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:38, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Seasonal affective disorder (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to 49th parallel, 45th parallel, 38th parallel, 42nd parallel, 41st parallel, 40th parallel, 17th parallel, 35th parallel, 1st parallel, 2nd parallel, 3rd parallel, 4th parallel, 5th parallel, 6th parallel, 7th parallel, 8th parallel, 9th parallel, 10th parallel, 11th parallel, 12th parallel, 13th parallel, 14th parallel, 15th parallel, 16th parallel, 18th parallel, 19th parallel, 20th parallel, 21st parallel, 22nd parallel, 23rd parallel, 24th parallel, 25th parallel, 26th parallel, 27th parallel, 28th parallel, 29th parallel, 30th parallel, 31st parallel, 32nd parallel, 33rd parallel, 34th parallel, 36th parallel, 37th parallel, 39th parallel, 43rd parallel, 44th parallel, 46th parallel, 47th parallel, 48th parallel, 50th parallel, 51st parallel, 52nd parallel, 53rd parallel, 54th parallel, 55th parallel, 56th parallel, 57th parallel, 58th parallel, 59th parallel, 60th parallel, 61st parallel, 62nd parallel, 63rd parallel, 64th parallel, 65th parallel, 66th parallel, 67th parallel, 68th parallel, 69th parallel, 70th parallel, 71st parallel, 72nd parallel, 73rd parallel, 74th parallel, 75th parallel, 76th parallel, 77th parallel, 78th parallel, 79th parallel, 80th parallel, 81st parallel, 82nd parallel, 83rd parallel, 84th parallel, 85th parallel, 86th parallel, 87th parallel, 88th parallel, 89th parallel and 90th parallel

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:49, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Golomyanniy Island Polar Station, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. –eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 18:53, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Holly Day, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 02:38, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Daylight hours by latitude, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:11, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daylight hours by latitude and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Daylight hours by latitude, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 06:15, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Appple! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 06:15, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Golomyanniy Island Polar Station, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Twilight instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I appreciate that a large amount of effort went into this, but the subject is already covered extensively in Twilight. The large table is not appropriate for an encyclopedia, since it's basically a raw compendium of data from other sources; see WP:RAWDATA

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daylight hours by latitude and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Daylight hours by latitude, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 16:11, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Golomyanniy Island Polar Station. Thanks! dibbydib (T ･ C) 01:26, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

needs more sourcing

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Golomyanniy Island Polar Station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Golomyanniy Island Polar Station, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:27, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]