Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Henry III, Holy Roman Emperor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lorrain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sajnálattal láttam, hogy copyvio miatt törölve lett a hiteleshelyekről szóló cikk itt, az angol wikin. Ez igen szomorú, mert egy jól használható cikk volt. A jelenlegi csonkot nincs kedved kibővíteni? Mégiscsak a Magyar Királyság egyik legfontosabb intézményrendszeréről van szó. Sajnos az én angolom ilyen jogi témához már kevés. Ha esetleg lenne kedved/időd, a régi cikket lementettem, így arra lehet támaszkodni, szívesen elküldöm. A magyar változat a megadott bibliográfián túl impozáns listát tartalmaz a téma szakirodalmáról. Ha van rá igény, ezek beszerzésében esetleg tudok segíteni. Tényleg a cikk fontossága miatt kérek ilyet. Válaszod várva, üdvözlettel, --Norden1990 (talk) 14:42, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hát, igen, régi bűnök árnya messzire elér. Még ifjú voltam és bohó. :) Előbb-utóbb nekilátok, kibővítem, de most éppen más témákra koncentrálok. Ha jól látom, a magyar szócikk forrásainak többsége elérhető Arcanum-on. Azt veszem észre, kevesebben vagyunk. Nem jó ez. Borsoka (talk) 15:57, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sajnos én is ezt tapasztalom. Mostanában én sem vagyok túl aktív, bár a 2019-es mérlegem így sem rossz, sok régóta tervezett bővítésre és létrehozásra sikerült sort kerítenem. Most azt látom, magyar történelem témában szinte alig történik valami előrelépés, ami sajnálatos, mert ezzel szemben a történettudomány aktivitása az elmúlt években láthatóan fellendült. --Norden1990 (talk) 17:16, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not asking you to chime in there -- that could look like canvassing -- but I was curious as to what your thoughts are on the current convo on Talk:Romance peoples. Cheers! --Calthinus (talk) 22:32, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. Sorry, I have only limited knowledge on the topic. Borsoka (talk) 02:09, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Raymond III, Count of Tripoli you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cplakidas -- Cplakidas (talk) 18:40, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Raymond III, Count of Tripoli you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Raymond III, Count of Tripoli for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cplakidas -- Cplakidas (talk) 13:20, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Borsoka, why are you deleting my addition to the continuity theory section? It’s a perfectly accurate and cited addition in the relevant place. I could have expanded in the individual scenarios document by document, case by case, but I kept it short. Beriboe (talk) 17:12, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not deleting. I deleted it once. It contains OR. I will edit it to properly summarize Pop's (continuity) views. Borsoka (talk) 01:05, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild og Copy Editors of the article Boril of Bulgaria has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Please check my wording in the Uprising section. I changed "The exact circumstances of the movement are uncertain, because a Hungarian royal charter, which was issued in 1250, preserved to "suppressed" which I think was your intended meaning.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:48, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Twofingered Typist:, thank you for your comprehensive copyedit. I modified the above text ([1]). Could you check it? Thank you for your assistance. I highly appreciate your work. Borsoka (talk) 02:09, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Borsoka: I've had a look and made a minor edit. Regards, Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:33, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Theodore I Laskaris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doux (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Theodore I Laskaris has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:18, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Twofingered Typist:, thank you for your assistance. I am grateful to you for your hard work. Borsoka (talk) 15:27, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Borsoka: You're very welcome. Cheers! Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:18, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comprehensive copyedit. I highly appreciate your work. Have a nice day. Borsoka (talk) 05:54, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem; good luck with your planned GA nomination. :) Cheers, Baffle☿gab 19:21, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]