Hi GanGsin! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello, GanGsin. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Bin Weevils, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Eni vak (speak) 17:36, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I know quite a lot about the game it's self that's why I'm trying to add information that I know and has been said GanGsin (talk) 17:45, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the information is also incorrect and out dated on the page GanGsin (talk) 17:47, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Enivak. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bin Weevils, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Sorry, this is not my rules, but Wikipedia's, so we all must do what they say. And, as i mentioned in the previous message, if you have a COI, you shall disclose it. Eni vak (speak) 20:05, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I see you provided an website, but i keep reverting them because you just mention the source on the edit summary; you must wp:cite it using the Reference template or the "cite" button (the latter only on the Visual editor, the former only in the nrmal editor). Thanks, Eni vak (speak) 16:35, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bin Weevils. Wikipedia is not a collection of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links may include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 12:57, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I see you have learned to use the template, i accepted your edits. Keep up the great work! (sorry for telling that, but it seems a little weird that your most edits are on that article. You should consider also editing in other articles, because maybe sometime an admin may think you're paid for that; but,so long as you edits have no problems, you're ok.) Eni vak (speak) 13:33, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hammersoft were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:55 Pixels and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:55 Pixels, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hammersoft (talk) 00:41, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 97198 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add sources to independent secondary sources (i.e. not affiliated with the company) to establish the company's notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:55 Pixels and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:55 Pixels, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

97198 (talk) 10:47, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is still something wrong with the Moshi Monsters article. It's at the bottom of the page, and I've realized that it is a Discovery Kids show. Please help improve that article if you can! 95.144.200.155 (talk) 22:05, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]