Department of Fun Project‑class Bottom‑importance

This page is supported by the Department of Fun, which aims to provide Wikipedians with fun so that they stay on Wikipedia and keep on improving articles. If you have any ideas, do not hesitate to post them to the discussion page or access our home page to join the Department of Fun.Department of FunWikipedia:Department of FunTemplate:WikiProject Department of FunDepartment of Fun Project This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Bottom This page has been rated as Bottom-importance on the importance scale.

A merge between pages is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:Talk page watcher#Merge suggested. --Elonka 01:34, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to say thank-you for deleting that image..

• Thanks for link @ Airplanes talk Mlpearc MESSAGE 02:34, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As I told Gerardw, I created a new account and it is not my fault my signature does not do a link. It's a problem your techies will have to fix.--BlueRider12 14:58, 10 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bpell (talk • contribs)

Replied on user's talk page. –xeno^talk 15:09, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This actually made me laugh, lool Pass a Method talk 23:28, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Does the following exerpt from the article's opening paragraphs mean that talk page stalkers do not have a life?

"Talk page stalkers... should not be confused... with people who have a life."

--MaxAMSC (talk) 21:34, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Erm, I'm trying to think what else you think it could mean. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:52, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to point out to all users, that this essay is not named after me. Many thanks. Jaguar (talk) 21:57, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LOL — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.19.139.81 (talk) 08:04, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hello im new and i need help with this whole thing (wikipedia) so can someone help me?! and please talk in my talk page please (talk) x@vier (talk)

I have opened a discussion about encouraging the use of "watcher" rather than "stalker" on pages related to this one, which may lead to significant changes to this page. If you would like to participate, please see Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 118#Encourage use of "watcher" in place of "stalker" on talk pages. Ivanvector (talk) 21:56, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

21 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Planecrashexpert (talk • contribs) 23:14, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

what do you consider "having a life", as "snobs" / rude egocentric people often say the phrase " get a life" to people giving them information they don't want to hear. What exactly is "get a life"? I find this article offensive and in my country to slander ones name is illegal. So what do you mean? It is talk pages that are used for talk and to notice changes you must watch the page. (Crlinformative (talk) 05:21, 31 March 2016 (UTC))[reply]

I'm just trying to provide a link with information about the shrub... Medicinal sourced from vitamin website is best listing of drug effects and I do not know how to word effects into my own phrasing? — Preceding unsigned comment added by McGillD83 (talk • contribs) 12:28, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's looking much seriously written joke! Lol—Constanstin 15:21, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article seems a bit less humorous than most WikiFun articles, since talk page stalkers CAN actually be helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RedPanda25 (talk • contribs) 01:50, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oshwar sent me here to discuss about 1676 1681 Russo Türkish War

In page of this war is written as result Indecisive but Ottoman Empire captured the Russian territories South Ukraine and that Chigirin what Warplace were and owned these warplaces until to second Russo Türkish 1686 1700 War. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historiker123454 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not clean-up, but I think a re-organisation of the content is a requirement now, as {{TL}} (ooh the irony!), images, and samples are scattered all over the page. —usernamekiran(talk) 22:10, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have edited all the contents of user page and now it won't look like any kind of promotional content. Kindly review my user page and suggest any further changes needed so that it can help us to improve my user page.--Mohsin Jameel MJ (talk) 09:34, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do people actually intentionally stalk? Once I add someone's talk page to my watch list for an actual discussion, I tend not to remove them. I won't actually stalk unless an edit summary looks like it needs more thought. That depends on how people write their summaries. Gah4 (talk) 19:01, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gah4, if they are someone I like, I'll probably keep their talk page in my watchlist. That's just me, though. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 20:22, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And you added them to your talk page before needing it for a discussion? I pretty much add any article to my watch list when I edit it. I only remove it, if the edit rate is excessive. And talk pages for actual discussion, and remove for the same reason. I only just found out about this page. Gah4 (talk) 21:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah sometimes. It's great for checking up on newbies! If things get dodgy, I try to be there. However, I am suffering from watch-list overload at the moment. In those cases I just check what the latest revision of the page is. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 21:55, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My watch list only shows the latest edit. I thought about changing it, but then I might have watch list overload. If I go away for a day or two, it still gets pretty big. I might miss some changes, though. Gah4 (talk) 22:23, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]