You may wish to request oversight for your edits which leaked your IP address. Jerod Lycett (talk) 19:52, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @ Jerod Lycett, the IP address given was a school computer. That being the case, should I still be concerned? Coachbricewilliams28 (talk) 20:11, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you value your privacy you may. If you don't care as much, you can leave it. Was just advising that it is there if you don't want people knowing your IP. Jerod Lycett (talk) 06:01, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brice, re: your comments at Talk:International Christian Church, while as an admin I would generally prefer to stay out of the content discussions, I had some general Wikipedia notes based on your request to be pinged. If you click the star icon at the top of either the talk page or the article, both the article and the talk page will be added to your Watchlist, which you can access by clicking the Watchlist link at the top of the page. This may make it easier for you to see updates to either the article or the talk page, especially if you don't have many pages watchlisted. (Me, I've got 12,200...Wow.) You can ping other editors like JamieBrown2011 by either using {{u|JamieBrown2011}} or {{ping|JamieBrown2011}} (the latter yields a colon after the name, buuuuut, the ping system is a little buggy, and it will only work if you ping them at the same time you add your comment and sign your post with four tildes. If you come back after the fact to edit your post, or to add the ping, it won't work, even if you re-sign the post. In that case, using {{Talkback}} on the other party's talk page may help to draw their attention to the discussion. I know, I know. Very confusing... Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:58, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cyphoidbomb I think there is a chance I'm learning! haha Did I do this correct? Coachbricewilliams28 (talk) 00:05, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Worked fine. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:23, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Qewr4231 (talk) 02:33, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Coachbricewilliams28. Thank you. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 18:51, 2 January 2019 (UTC) Checkuser run, unrelated. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 21:55, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The most I know about Phoenix is from Medium (TV Series), which my mum rather enjoys! I've been to Florida, but when I'm financially independent I'll probably visit more of the US. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 21:55, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Sedona, the Grand canyon and the Havasupai falls are beautiful side trips if you are working your way to Vegas. Haha Coachbricewilliams28 (talk) 21:58, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I think I'm less the type to be visiting Las Vegas, more Los Alamos! Although I could end up doing the Race Across America some day, I suppose. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 22:11, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On my talk page, you said: "I'm no ACV doctor, but I noticed about 2 years ago you removed an addition I made citiating it was "weak primary sources." I'm curious if you can extrapolate on that because the evidence was beyond obvious to me when I was in the lab ( not involved ) but observing that study. The ABC lab published these findings in peer reviewed medical journals as well and eventually they were accepted to NCBI. To me, that isn't the definition of "weak" so I figured I would ask. =) This is what I posted --> A 2016 study showed Anti-obesogenic effects of apple cider vinegar (ACV) in rats subjected to a high fat diet. Source: PMID 27209492 A 2007 study showed that "vinegar affects insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients with diabetic gastroparesis by reducing the gastric emptying rate." This same study concluded that ACV did not decrease post-postprandial glucose levels but mildly increased due to the ratio of simple carbohydrate content of the food used during the study. Source: PMID 18093343 In a 2010 study by Dr. Carol Johnston concluded "The antiglycemic properties of vinegar are evident when small amounts of vinegar are ingested with meals composed of complex carbohydrates. In these situations, vinegar attenuated PPG by 20% compared to placebo." Source: PMID 20068289

PMID 27209492 is a rat study which we don't use as a source for content on human health; see WP:MEDANIMAL and WP:MEDASSESS. PMID 18093343 and PMID 20068289 were weak, small-subject (9 or 10 people) studies far too preliminary to cite for the encyclopedia; they have not been corroborated by larger or more rigorous clinical research. Content on human health or disease should be sourced to a systematic review or meta-analysis of completed, high-quality clinical trials, discussed in MEDASSESS. Just to clarify your statement about results that "were accepted to NCBI." You may be assuming that a published article listed on PubMed, an NCBI listing service, is somehow approved or validated by the National Center for Biotechnology Information and the National Library of Medicine which publishes PubMed; no such approval or validation is undertaken, as explained here. You can respond on your talk page if you wish to discuss further. --Zefr (talk) 22:31, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No; wonderful explanation. Thanks for the clarity. Coachbricewilliams28 (talk) 22:33, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Most editors put very little about themselves on their User page. Not prohibited. Mostly, it is for explaining one's intent as a Wikipedia editor.David notMD (talk) 05:23, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]