Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

User talk:Appple: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
I'm coming up cold...: but here's a joke off the top of my head
Line 114: Line 114:


Why did you [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pole_of_Inaccessibility_(Antarctic_research_station)&diff=867102640&oldid=805960975 add a link] of [[Crime in Antarctica]] to article [[Pole of Inaccessibility (Antarctic research station)]]? Neither article mentions a 'crime' at the station. Is it possible you meant to add the link to a different Antarctic-related article? [[User:Shenme|Shenme]] ([[User talk:Shenme|talk]]) 22:51, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Why did you [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pole_of_Inaccessibility_(Antarctic_research_station)&diff=867102640&oldid=805960975 add a link] of [[Crime in Antarctica]] to article [[Pole of Inaccessibility (Antarctic research station)]]? Neither article mentions a 'crime' at the station. Is it possible you meant to add the link to a different Antarctic-related article? [[User:Shenme|Shenme]] ([[User talk:Shenme|talk]]) 22:51, 19 January 2019 (UTC)


Oh, I just remembered an Antarctic joke [[User:Shenme|Shenme]] ([[User talk:Shenme|talk]]) 22:55, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
:Boffin latest
::Arrests were made after an argument over stolen cake led to a fight
::among scientists studying sea birds on an Arctic island, in a
:::muffin stuffing Baffin puffin boffin biffing cuffing.

Revision as of 22:55, 19 January 2019

AfD nomination of Scott Lake, Thurston County, Washington

An article that you have been involved in editing, Scott Lake, Thurston County, Washington, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Lake, Thurston County, Washington. Thank you. Deor (talk) 03:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We seem to have forgotten to welcome you. Please check our guide to writing Wikipedia articles, and our list showing all the things to do here. I don't think your first article will stand, but I hope you continue working here and finding somethin more substantial for an article--it was a good try, but the subject just isn't notable. See WP:N for a guide to what sort of things are more suitable for an encyclopedia. DGG (talk) 04:31, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Scott Lake, Thurston County, Washington. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Deor (talk) 05:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to the page Scott Lake, Thurston County, Washington constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Versus22 talk 05:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Scott Lake, Thurston County, Washington. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Versus22 talk 05:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Scott Lake, Thurston County, Washington. Versus22 talk 05:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to be helpful

If you want the article to be deleted (and assuming that you, when not logged in, are the IP editors who have contributed to the article), you might try inserting the template {{db-author}} at the top of the article. Deor (talk) 05:46, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Useight (talk) 07:04, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Your recent edit to the page Speed of light appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 07:33, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Orders of magnitude (temperature), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Furnace Creek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vashon Glaciation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington State. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:19, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Appple. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Appple. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Late Cenozoic Ice Age, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calabrian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Antarctic Treaty System into Crime in Antarctica. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:35, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The copied content has been removed from the Crime in Antarctica page. More specific and relevant content to crime in Antarctica is being added. - Appple (talk) 02:15, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Tasmanian Passage

Thanks for creating Tasmanian Passage.

A New Page Patroller Boleyn just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 17:25, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Appple. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Appple. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vashon Glaciation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calabrian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm coming up cold...

Why did you add a link of Crime in Antarctica to article Pole of Inaccessibility (Antarctic research station)? Neither article mentions a 'crime' at the station. Is it possible you meant to add the link to a different Antarctic-related article? Shenme (talk) 22:51, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Oh, I just remembered an Antarctic joke Shenme (talk) 22:55, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Boffin latest
Arrests were made after an argument over stolen cake led to a fight
among scientists studying sea birds on an Arctic island, in a
muffin stuffing Baffin puffin boffin biffing cuffing.