User	Talk	Articles	Awards	DYK	Sandbox	Victoria Cross

Archives

Archive 1 (June 2007 – June 2008) Archive 2 (July – August 2008) Archive 3 (September – October 2008) Archive 4 (November – December 2008) Archive 5 (January – February 2009) Archive 6 (March – April 2009) Archive 7 (May – June 2009) Archive 8 (July – August 2009) Archive 9 (September – October 2009) Archive 10 (November – December 2009) Archive 11 (January – February 2010) Archive 12 (March – August 2010) Archive 13 (September 2010 – September 2012) Archive 14 (October 2012 – October 2014) Archive 15 (November 2014 – November 2016)

Welcome!

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at America's nuclear capability at the start of the Cold War Review essay: Hawkeye7 on the Manhatten Project suite of articles Op-ed: TomStar81 discusses leadership changes in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:37, 26 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at three recent works Op-ed: TomStar81 on a curious episode of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at submarine warfare in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:23, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw your undo of my edit on the Monash bio page - I am new to Wikipedia so apologies. I thought that his relationship with Annie Gabriel was a significant and notable part of his life, given he prevaricated over whether or not to marry her rather than Vic. I added a citation to an article in The Australian - hopefully this is sufficient. DB (talk) 15:02, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at works on two facets of US military power Op-ed: TomStar81 on the Russian Revolution Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at air power and nuclear weaponry Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on Australia's part in the advance on the Hindenburg Line Timeline: This month in World War I

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Peter Edwards (historian) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 11:22, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Peter Edwards (historian) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Peter Edwards (historian) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 04:22, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Peter Edwards (historian) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Peter Edwards (historian) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 06:22, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Strategic Air Command doctrine Op-ed: Tomstar81 looks at a little-known aspect of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

My reply to you is at my talk page. Cheers, Grant | Talk 17:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at the Battle of Kokoda and US defence acquisition in the 1960s Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the Battle of Messines Timeline: This month in World War I

At this stage I am in process of writing a report about discussions in Australia about https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2017 the cycle 2 of the broader wikimedia strategy -

You may well have responded elsewhere - but if you at all interested - not the slightest bother if you are not - please feel free to contact on or off wiki - thanks JarrahTree 05:12, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please direct me to where it says that the notes/reference section should be split into multiple columns even when there are only a handful of entries? WP:ASL says nothing of the sort, and Template:Reflist#Columns recommends 30em to be used only when "Where there are many footnotes plus a page-width Bibliography subsection" which is not the case here. To be honest that formatting looks confusing and disjointed on a computer screen as well. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:59, 15 June 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Hi, I've noticed you have edited many military related articles. There are a small group of people who keep adding flagicons to the military sections of presidents infoboxes. Articles include Harry S. Truman, James K. Polk, John Tyler, Gerald Ford and a few others. As an experienced editor if you could help resolve this issue that would be greatly appreciated, thanks. Huberthoff (talk) 14:10, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hubertoff hasn't mention me directly, and I guess that's being kind, but I think his interpretation of the MoS is incorrect. Please consider Historical considerations, especially as it relates to the presidents of the United States. My only other concern is that he went on a tear, editing infoboxes at a rate of one per minute. Any guidance you can offer would be appreciated. — Myk Streja ^(who?) 14:48, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have weighed in at Huberthoff's talk page. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 14:49, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion going on over at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history about flagicons in infoboxes as well as on my talk page. It seems as though there are small yet vocal group of editors who disagree with our interpretation. Since I am a new user, I figure I may not be the best representative of this interpretation, and so your input would have more value. Thanks, - Huberthoff (talk) 21:13, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

G'day BS. I just listed Edgar Towner as a potential TFA on 1 Sep next year for the 100th anniversary of his VC. No action required, just thought I'd let you know. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:47, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Peacemaker. Thanks for letting me know. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 01:47, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at planning for the unthinkable Op-ed: TomStar81 on Russia's Provisional Government in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Hi Bryce, hope you're well. Last time I checked MOS following the change re. year ranges, it was still fine to use two digits for successive years, e.g. 1950–51, and also in infoboxes generally, where space is at a premium. Not fussed at all with the changes you've made to some articles I've worked on, I just mention it so you don't make more work for yourself if you don't want to... ;-) Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 22:35, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ian. Good to hear from you, and I hope you are well. Regarding year ranges, I was told (somewhat forcefully) during three GA reviews I've had in the last few months that MOS:DATERANGE had reverted to a preference for four digits. I had a look at the MOS the time, but it does seem that I missed the caveat on infoboxes and successive years. My sincere apologies, and please do feel free to revert my changes. Admittedly, the edits started out as general formatting and clarity tweaks on battalion articles as a fit of procrastination, and just extended into a few articles on air force units (where there was little to tweak, thanks to you and Nick...!). Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 04:08, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all, I don't think the changes you made have affected the spacing/line-breaks so no prob, it really was just about reducing any unnecessary labour...! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 04:27, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stanley Gibbs you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 05:20, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Stanley Gibbs you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Stanley Gibbs for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 06:01, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Stanley Gibbs you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stanley Gibbs for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 06:41, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I was wondering why are you reverting the changes I made on the military biographical articles? It's customary to show the flag of alliegiance of the individual's country in the template (ex. Ulysses S. Grant, Herbert Kitchener, etc.)-WikiEditor668 (talk) 11:38, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WikiEditor668. As per my edit summaries, WP:INFOBOXFLAG advises against the use of flag icons in infoboxes, viz: "flag icons should not be used in infoboxes, even when there is a 'country', 'nationality' or equivalent field: they are unnecessarily distracting and give undue prominence to one field among many." Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 11:50, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Battle of Messines and recent Australian Army leadership; Nick-D on South African armour Op-ed: Nick-D talks photography Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at two recent releases Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on ANZACs in the Third Ypres Offensive Timeline: This month in World War I

		The Military history A-Class medal with oak leaves
		On behalf of the Wikiproject Military history coordinators, I am pleased to award you the A-Class Medal with Oakleaves for your excellent work on the Alan McNicoll, William McAloney, and Alfred Shout articles. Anotherclown (talk) 06:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded the WikiChevrons for reviewing a total of five Milhist articles at PR, GAN, ACR or FAC during the period Jul to Sep 2017. Thank you for supporting Wikipedia's quality content processes. AustralianRupert (talk) 09:25, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply] Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at Australian involvement on the Western Front in 1918 and in post-war New Guinea Op-ed: TomStar81 on the October Revolution Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 on late 1917 naval warfare Timeline: This month in World War I

Precious

Five years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:25, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Six years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:44, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abraham, B.S.. You have new messages at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Param Vir Chakra.
Message added 02:53, 20 November 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:53, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abraham, B.S.. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 on the Halifax Explosion of 1917 Timeline: This month in World War I

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 04:00, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please review WP:BRD. When your Bold edit has been Reverted by another editor, the next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to Discuss it on the article talk page, not to re-revert it, which is the first step to edit warring. During the discussion, the article remains in the status quo ante. Thanks, Beyond My Ken (talk) 07:49, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Beyond My Ken: You may note that I did start a thread on the relevant talk page prior to your latest mass revert... Abraham, B.S. (talk) 07:52, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at tropical medicine and Operation Market Garden Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on US Army doctrine in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Re your revert: you refer to the template doc for birth_name, but then please also follow that for name which requires the full name. - Sorry, I'm not familiar with military persons, - for normal persons it's different, name = comon name, and birth_name given if different. Compare Max Reger. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:53, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Napoleonic Wars and Hawkeye7 on World War II Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on generalship in 1918 Timeline: This month in World War I

Could you elaborate a little more on the 'inconsistencies in terminology and formatting' you thought my edit introduced? Phinn (talk) 13:38, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at a work by Daniel Ellsberg Op-ed: TomStar81 on the 1918 flu pandemic Timeline: This month in World War I

Hi there! I noticed you changed the page title for the article on Hamish Mahaddie. I debated what would be the best title with myself for a while and was not sure. I thought that was a good change. There is another article I have worked on that I was thinking of changing the page name for and was wondering if you could point me to how that is done. I can see copying the article, creating the new page with the new title, then making the old title a redirect page, but how do you move over all the edit changes? Is there a page that describes the steps involved? Is an administrator required? Any guidance would be appreciated. Gunbirddriver (talk) 04:41, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Gunbirddriver:. Provided there are no restrictions, any confirmed editor can move a page. It is a relatively easy process. At the top of the page you would like to move, hover your cursor over the 'More' tab. Underneath will appear 'Move'. Click that and you will be taken to a new screen where you can enter the desired name change and write your justification for doing so. The previous name page will automatically become a redirect, so anyone clicking on or searching the previous title will be redirected to the new page. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 04:56, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh. Brilliant!! It worked!! Thanks so much. Gunbirddriver (talk) 05:05, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
• updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the bombing of Darwin; recent books by female military historians Review essay: K.e.coffman on Wikipedia's representations of the Nazi German military Op-ed: TomStar81 on the Red Baron Timeline: This month in World War I

		Military history service award
		On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded the WikiChevrons for reviewing a Milhist article at PR, GAN, ACR or FAC during the period January to March 2018. Thank you for supporting Wikipedia's quality content processes. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 09:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at coalitions and logistics in World War II, and Nick-D at Australia's frontier wars Timeline: This month in World War I

I note you have removed the section from my wikipedia page which showed my service ribbons, as they were, in your opinion, "unsourced" (See talk page CFred). I find this puzzling, as the sources are clearly there (see current page for award of the Order of Australia and the Military Cross, for example (I have removed the reference to the National Medal, as it's simply for years of service). There have been (quite regrettably) instances of individuals claiming gallantry medals for which they're not entitled, but my Military Cross, for example, has been in the public domain and the citation housed in the Australian War Memorial ever since it was awarded (unusually - in-country) in Vietnam in 1970. I would be grateful if the images of the ribbon bars could be restored. Best wishes, Adrian d'hagé — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adhage01 (talk • contribs) 02:42, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Adhage01: As you have noted, the main awards—Member of the Order of Australia and Military Cross—are already mentioned and sourced elsewhere in the article. The ribbon images, however, included your service and campaign medals to which a reliable and independent source does not exist. You may have already reviewed these policies, but as per WP:BLP, WP:V and WP:RS it is a requirement that material included on Wikipedia is referenced to a reliable and appropriate third-party source. This is particularly pertinent for biographies of living persons. Accordingly, there is currently no scope to include the service and campaign medals on Wikipedia. Please also note that the inclusion of ribbon images on Wikipedia pages has a contentious history, is not generally standard, and such lists tend only to appear in low quality articles. I notice that others have said this already, but it is also worth noting that editing one's own Wikipedia page is strongly discouraged due to the obvious conflict of interest. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 03:09, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'm not sure that the wikipedia page of the Governor General of Australia, Sir Peter Cosgrove (complete with medal ribbons) could be described as a "low quality article". That said, I note your requirement for sources, which I will now endeavour to retrieve. As to not editing my own page, I can assure you, nothing would give me greater pleasure than "to get off this show" - as I've noted elsewhere, I've gone on here to try and address the many complaints I've received about the deficiencies on this page. Best wishes, Adrian d'Hagé — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adhage01 (talk • contribs) 03:30, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 on a supergun of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: This month's external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 on the murder of the Romanovs Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at a classic US official history Op-ed: TomStar81 on belated declarations of war in 1916–18 Timeline: This month in World War I

'Rare' is the wrong word when 1358 awards have been awarded and more than 10% of these awards have been bought by one person. The statement ‘Owing to its rarity, the VC is highly prized …’ is inaccurate. The VC is not highly prized because of its rarity but because it is the highest British award which captured the imagination of the public in the second half of the 19th century and that esteem has continued to this day. I suggest that sale prices have increased because of the esteem for the award and because many are already in institutions rather than the rarity of the medal. I would appreciate it if you would restore my edit. Anthony Staunton (talk) 15:38, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Anthony Staunton: I think the above was intended for @MrDemeanour's talk page? Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 00:15, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! Thank you for alerting me to my error. I am always happy to be corrected. Anthony Staunton (talk) 11:05, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Indy Beetle and Nick-D on the Katangese Gendarmes and India during World War II Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at two important treaties of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.[reply]

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:28, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the use of so-called "substandard" manpower in armies Interview: On the Bugle turning 150 (issues that is!) Op-ed: TomStar81 on the collapse of empires at the close of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Peacemaker67 looks at the Sydney Wars Op-ed: TomStar81 on the end of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Hello, Abraham, B.S.. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abraham, B.S.. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure you would be interested in the discussion going on at Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Biography#Request_for_comment:_Size_of_post-nominals. Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 16:50, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Indy beetle looks at military newspapers in East Africa

Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at Albert Speer Op-ed: Factotem on common problems affecting infoboxes Timeline: This month in World War I