Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Talk:De Administrando Imperio: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
178.223.72.121 (talk)
178.223.72.121 (talk)
Line 19: Line 19:
which is the latest and greatest Moravcsik-Jenkins work. Why to replace it by some 1967 edition in the Sources section?
which is the latest and greatest Moravcsik-Jenkins work. Why to replace it by some 1967 edition in the Sources section?


If the article is based on the best edition-translation what use of mentioning some efforts made by almost anonymous Croats in 1910 and 1934?
If the article is based on the best edition-translation what use of mentioning some efforts made by almost anonymous Croats in 1910 and 1931?


Then what use of mentioning Kreutz and Zivkovic if these two authors are touching only a very narrow part of the book content?--[[Special:Contributions/178.223.72.121|178.223.72.121]] ([[User talk:178.223.72.121|talk]]) 20:36, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Then what use of mentioning Kreutz and Zivkovic if these two authors are touching only a very narrow part of the book content?

At the end, proposal: If someone wants to talk about Serbs and Croats history as given in the DAI, let him write a new article, DAI and Serbs and Croats. Then Zivkovic and Ferjancic, Manojlović and Hauptmann could come in play as authors.--[[Special:Contributions/178.223.72.121|178.223.72.121]] ([[User talk:178.223.72.121|talk]]) 21:17, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:17, 21 November 2018

A few questions

Up to this version the article content was based on

De Administrando Imperio by Constantine Porphyrogenitus, edited by Gy. Moravcsik and translated by R. J. H. Jenkins, Dumbarton Oaks Center for Byzantine Studies, Washington D. C., 1993

which is the latest and greatest Moravcsik-Jenkins work. Why to replace it by some 1967 edition in the Sources section?

If the article is based on the best edition-translation what use of mentioning some efforts made by almost anonymous Croats in 1910 and 1931?

Then what use of mentioning Kreutz and Zivkovic if these two authors are touching only a very narrow part of the book content?

At the end, proposal: If someone wants to talk about Serbs and Croats history as given in the DAI, let him write a new article, DAI and Serbs and Croats. Then Zivkovic and Ferjancic, Manojlović and Hauptmann could come in play as authors.--178.223.72.121 (talk) 21:17, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]