User talk:Freedom skies: Difference between revisions
Bakasuprman (talk | contribs) interesting |
Request |
||
| Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
[[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Green23]] . [[User:Bakasuprman|Bakaman]] <font color = "blue"><sub>[[User talk:Bakasuprman|Bakatalk]]</sub></font> 03:51, 8 November 2006 (UTC) |
[[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Green23]] . [[User:Bakasuprman|Bakaman]] <font color = "blue"><sub>[[User talk:Bakasuprman|Bakatalk]]</sub></font> 03:51, 8 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
== Request == |
|||
Hi, Mir Jaffer here. (pun intended) Please stop adding entire paragraphs from the book. I'm keeping only the relevant quotes on the war. If you want, why not quote the entire book? Might as well make the 65 war a repository of what Stanley Wolpert had to say. I hope you can understand. I'm planning to post a straw poll if we disagree on the talk page to arrive at a consensus on how to tackle this. I've used some of what he has to say in other related articles. |
|||
btw, take a look at [[Martial Race]] theory where one Pak editor with racial and religious bias is attempting to push his POV, though my sources are reliable third party or Pakistani ones that implicates pakistan's obsession of that theory and their downfall in 65 and 71 wars. It appears [[User:Street Scholar]] doesn't have a thorough grasp on subcontinental history and doesn't read the sources and is making problems. I'm asking u to look since you seem inclined towards the martial arts. Tx. [[User:Idleguy|Idleguy]] 05:42, 8 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 05:42, 8 November 2006
 Past discussions |
|---|
ALL INDIANS AND HUMANS PL. APPEAL TO MR.TERRYJ-HO IN STRONGEST WORD FOR HIS SUCH COMMENTS ON TALK PAGE OF Dmcdevit. Swadhyayee 14:21, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
The practice of Sati continues till this day..mostly due to religious sanction TerryJ-Ho 11:16, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Mr.TerryJ-Ho, If, your above statement is intentional, you are doing the worst thing of tarnishing the image of our country. I do not know your back-ground. Hope you will appreciate that sentiments of any person get hurt when his/her nation/religion/societies come under false attack. How would you feel, if so done to you? India has a population of 120,00,00000. I have completed 56 years in this country and sufficiently informed about things going in this country. I have moved in villages regularly and live in Mumbai from birth. I have hardly heard of one or two instance of Sati during my life of 56 yrs. You can't help the people who wants to self immolate. We have rich & poor, educated and un-educated, modern and orthodox, good and bad all kind of people like any other country would have. Sati Pratha came in social practice because of Muslims invaded small kingdoms, killed or captured males, raped and made women folk their wives. Indians mostly were strict vegetarians. Muslims are non-veg. The women preferred death over being raped or marrying for the second time against Hindu culture and customs. The pride of woman-hood and un-civilised behaviour of Muslims are the route cause of this deprecative social system. Though people like me who borned later are also full of wounds of the root cause of Muslims behaviour. Pl. don't make fun of our pitiable social system which do not exist anymore from more than 5 decades. You shall make yourself and your society a shame for such remarks. Can you show me a single evidence that the system of Sati exist and the roots are our religion? Where did you get this information from? You are a shame Mr.TerryJ-Ho. God will not forgive you for such in-human behaviour. Swadhyayee 14:16, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dmcdevit"
ALL INDIANS AND HUMANS PL. APPEAL TO MR.TERRYJ-HO IN STRONGEST WORD FOR HIS SUCH COMMENTS ON TALK PAGE OF Dmcdevit. Swadhyayee 14:21, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:India"
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Notice_board_for_India-related_topics"
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bakasuprman"
Signpost updated for November 6th.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 2, Issue 45 | 6 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:12, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello,
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Thatcher131 12:43, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
interesting
Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Green23 . Bakaman Bakatalk 03:51, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Request
Hi, Mir Jaffer here. (pun intended) Please stop adding entire paragraphs from the book. I'm keeping only the relevant quotes on the war. If you want, why not quote the entire book? Might as well make the 65 war a repository of what Stanley Wolpert had to say. I hope you can understand. I'm planning to post a straw poll if we disagree on the talk page to arrive at a consensus on how to tackle this. I've used some of what he has to say in other related articles.
btw, take a look at Martial Race theory where one Pak editor with racial and religious bias is attempting to push his POV, though my sources are reliable third party or Pakistani ones that implicates pakistan's obsession of that theory and their downfall in 65 and 71 wars. It appears User:Street Scholar doesn't have a thorough grasp on subcontinental history and doesn't read the sources and is making problems. I'm asking u to look since you seem inclined towards the martial arts. Tx. Idleguy 05:42, 8 November 2006 (UTC)