Do you even check the edits you're reverting, or you just assume all IP users are vandals? Read the edit summary: the template is broken, you can tell by the obvious error message at the bottom of the page. I've been trying to fix that and you reverted my edits. Twice. Maybe it's time to find a new hobby.--93.42.65.170 (talk) 23:35, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I clicked the wrong button! Septrillion (talk) 23:37, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 --NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:17, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Which page/edit are you referring to? Septrillion (talk) 01:45, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Nehlen. See User_talk:NeilN#Re:_editing_articles_about_politics/politicians --NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:50, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Septrillion (talk) 01:57, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert my edits? I just fixed a category and you reverted again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:1315:44A2:0:E8AD:EEB2:9AB2 (talk) 23:58, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! Wrong button again! Septrillion (talk) 00:00, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About the recent edits on that page regarding Channel Awesome. Holly Christine Brown was already mentioned in one of the sources listed on that section (the article on Dailydot mentions her being sexually harassed by former Chief operating officer, Mike Ellis) and I thought it would be appropriate to list her as one of the notable victims (because she is). Also the source I added was a source related to the recent allegations regardingJustin Carmical (the source (a tweet) was also written by Holly Brown), as there was no source on the section related to Carmical (it was not in any of the articles already sourced), and this source was also on the Channel Awesome article (on the controversy section) which is where I got the source from. I'm sorry if it looks like I am "vandalizing", but I'm actually trying to add some sources related to these allegations (also I'm sorry if my wording and grammar is off). --73.240.105.138 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:48, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Accidentally pressed "Q" instead of "SPACE" when using Huggle. I reverted my revert. Septrillion (talk) 02:50, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

I have just published content for Mark Wright (entrepreneur), winner of the 2014 Apprentice (UK Series).

You recently removed the page I published for Mark Wright (entrepreneur) (4th April 2018). Your feedback indicated that you thought the page to be "promotional". I have removed any content that I thought you may have seen as promotional, and published the page again. However, you have made another request for speedy deletion.

It would be great if you could let us know how this content is "promotional". We have tried to ensure it is in keeping with other Apprentice winners (see Leah Totton and Susie Ma).

You have also deemed the content is inappropriate. I'm not sure how this can be considering Mark is already mentioned on a Wikipedia page for The Apprentice (Series 10) and his fellow winners also have Wikipedia pages (as mentioned above). Please can you explain why you believe the content to be inappropriate?

My colleague will be making some edits to the page shortly [improving content and formatting], so I'd be grateful if you could refrain from deleting the page for the time being.

Thank you in advance for your help.

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

--Helenareid (talk) 16:50, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Helena Reid

What is the rationale for the unexplained reversions at Canadian Conference of Mennonite Brethren Churches? 142.161.81.20 (talk) 22:55, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Accidental reversions. Septrillion (talk) 22:59, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple times? After you were expressly asked for a rationale more than once? 142.161.81.20 (talk) 23:01, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pressed "Q" instead of space. It is restored now. Septrillion (talk) 23:05, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have done this several more times now. What's with that? 142.161.81.20 (talk) 02:55, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My cat walked over my keyboard, causing the "Q" key to be pressed in the process! I sincerely apologize for my accidental reversions and will try to keep the cat away in the future! :) Septrillion (talk) 03:10, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You just did it again at Ernst von Dobschütz. 142.161.81.20 (talk) 03:59, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have self reverted again. Might I suggest an account? Septrillion (talk) 04:01, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) How would getting an account solve the problem of your cat repeatedly reverting contributions to the encyclopedia over the course of multiple days? That would just mean your cat would be reverting someone else's contributions, perhaps someone less likely to notice than I am. 142.161.81.20 (talk) 04:08, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have also archived the warnings because they were causing Huggle to get confused. Septrillion (talk) 04:06, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Beraen Hunter, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Septrillion (talk) 01:19, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Message intended for User:Septrilion. Septrillion (talk) 15:02, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Perkasie station. I do not think that Perkasie station fits any of the speedy deletion criteria  because A train station is a physical location, and so is not in scope for A7. I request that you consider not re-tagging Perkasie station for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 00:57, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I never planned on replacing a declined speedy. Septrillion (talk) 01:00, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am glad to hear it -- the above is standard language, because i never know who might consider doing so. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 01:55, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's a template? Septrillion (talk) 01:57, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, {{Speedy-Warn}}. I use it fairly often when i decline speed deletion tags. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 16:22, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think the larger issue is that you moved a Draft to Namespace just to speedy delete it. It's not what Drafts are for, and moving something to a different namespace just to get around the speedy deletion criteria is inappropriate. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 10:43, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Dear, i had missed that. That is not acceptable. Please do not do it again. If none of the criteria which apply in draft space fits (mostly the G criteria) then the draft should not be speedy deleted. It is fine for people to start incomplete, unsourced drafts, with the intent of improving them until they are ready for the main article space. To tag theses for speedy deletion is to violate WP:BITE and to "promote" them to mainspace so that the A-criteria seem to apply is to game the system. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 16:27, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@DESiegel and Amorymeltzer: The page had initially been created in mainspace but had been draftified by another editor. Had the article been speediable under WP:CSD#A7, would that not be gaming the system in the other direction? Septrillion (talk) 17:56, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See this diff. Septrillion (talk) 17:58, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No it would not be gaming the system, nor does it make the later move acceptable. It is common to move an article that is not ready for mainspace, but that might become a valid article with additional work, to draft space or user space to allow that work to proceed. I have done this myself many times. Look at my move log if you like. But once such a move has been made, the page is then a draft, no matter how it started. It may be moved to mainspace (or back to main space) by any confirmed editor who believes in good faith that it is ready for mainspace. It may not be moved with the intent of making it eligible for an A-series speedy deletion, or for AfD. If you really think it must be deleted, take it to MfD, but recall that as per WP:NMFD lack of notability is not relevant there, nor is lack of sources cited. I suppose your actions were undertaken in good faith, but please do not make such a move again. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 19:44, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I added references and a 1910 photo to Perkasie station and removed the prod. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:50, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple references almost always exist for any railway station, even if they are not included in the article, which is why railway stations are usually not deleted at AfD. Please see Wikipedia:RAILOUTCOMES and Wikipedia:Notability (Railway lines and stations). When I see an article about a railway station that lacks references, I generally try to find references to add to it. Sometimes an image on an old postcard can serve both as a reference and as a public-domain image to add to the article's infobox. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 07:20, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Septrillion. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Perkasie station, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: G6 doesn't apply to redirects as a result of routine pagemoves, and consensus is to keep draft->mainspace redirects. Thank you. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 10:23, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've undone a few more (pinging 331dot and Anthony Appleyard), but please note that WP:CSD#G6 explicitly does not apply to redirects from page moves unless they are unambiguously made in error, and in the case of Draft->Mainspace redirects, the community consensus is against deleting such redirects. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 10:38, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know. Septrillion (talk) 16:34, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, just a courtesy note to say I've removed the CSD A1 tag you added to the new article on Sakae Esuno. The criterion is not met here because there is definitely enough context to identify the subject and any potential notability. You may confirm this with a quick Google search. Whether other criteria apply is not under dispute. Normally, I prefer to WP:AGF and give these article creators a bit more time before putting their contributions to the axe. That way we don't put off new editors who genuinely wish to contribute positively. Regards,Nick Moyes (talk) 22:27, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note that the user in question did not put enough information that falls outside of the rules, therefore it is not a case for CSD:U5.-- Alexf^(talk) 00:21, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is climate change real? I mean people say global warming, but its -34 degrees here in Canada right now! Coolkid526 (talk) 00:36, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

YES ITS VERY REAL!!!!!! :) 00:38, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Before you revert, do you actually examine the changes? Because I removed vandalism that referred to John Scopes as a "Dookie butt", and don't understand why you would consider that worthy of reverting. Someone else has rectified the vandalism, but that was uncalled for. Pdinc (talk) 02:49, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I misread the diff. I thought that vandalism was being inserted, not removed. I think I'll call it quits for tonight and resume patrolling when I'm more alert/attentive. Septrillion (talk) 02:53, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal warned. Reverter de-warned and welcomed. Septrillion (talk) 02:58, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Septrillion. You have new messages at Mdriscoll03's talk page.
Message added 23:27, 20 April 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Absolutely, I will do next time. Once I recognized my mistake someone else actually requested the page for speedy deletion. Thank you for bringing this to my attention though, greatly appreciated. Mdriscoll03 (talk) 23:27, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Septrillion (talk) 23:28, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've revoked your ability to use rollback after this revert and subsequent automated report to AIV. Looking through your talk page, you've received a lot of complaints about this, and your answer seems to always be that it was a mistake. While I accept that everyone makes mistakes, you are responsible for all of your semi-automated edits, and the error rate here is too high. Pinging Mz7 as a courtesy since he granted the flag. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:14, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that my mistake was multi-tasking while using Huggle. I'm sure the error rate would have been much lower had I not done that. I will not make that mistake again, should I ever regain the flag. Septrillion (talk) 01:17, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging NeilN as the actual granter of the flag. Septrillion (talk) 01:21, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks for that. I saw Mz7 as the last log entry and misread it, that was for pending changes. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:24, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Septrillion, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (talk) 18:46, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

	The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar
	Congratulations, Septrillion! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (talk) 18:46, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I made a good edit my very first edit. and I was happy. then a message popped up-septrillion reverted your edit. bUT IT WAS A GOOD EDIT. so please, tell me why.

Explained at User talk:Fredthefishlord. Septrillion (talk) 01:18, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you so much your your help very much appreciated. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 02:18, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Septrillion (talk) 02:36, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would strongly suggest WP:DENY here. You're not helping. If the user is telling the truth, then all that can be said has already been said; if the user is trolling, then we are giving them exactly what they want by responding to them. Mz7 (talk) 07:34, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have contested it. But it won't do any good. WAY too many guidelines. NostalgiaBuff97501 (talk) 15:40, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Try reading Wikipedia:Your first article. Septrillion (talk) 17:24, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rich Mountain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

False positive. Previous link was already a redirect. Septrillion (talk) 16:49, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ok thank you i'm really sorry about that still kinda new to wiki.i'm a christian conservative vaporwave loving human being and if you are triggered then i'm sorry lol not. 00:33, 5 May 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaporwaveman34 (talk • contribs)

It's ok. I'm not triggered. I'm just stating the policy. Septrillion (talk) 01:03, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
4		Dominique Roman (talk)	Add sources
138		Shannon Beveridge (talk)	Add sources
248		Deliberative democracy (talk)	Add sources
23		ANT1 Group (talk)	Add sources
720		Chișinău (talk)	Add sources
468		Public broadcasting (talk)	Add sources
68		Inclusive Democracy (talk)	Cleanup
10		Federation of Green Parties of Africa (talk)	Cleanup
92		Libertarian perspectives on intellectual property (talk)	Cleanup
376		Zone to Defend (talk)	Expand
20		Media of Romania (talk)	Expand
76		Afrin Region (talk)	Expand
72		Dual power (Russian Revolution) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
96		Ultra-leftism (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,348		Sacco and Vanzetti (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
254		Rojava conflict (talk)	Merge
133		Appropriation bill (talk)	Merge
130		Syrian Kurdish–Islamist conflict (2013–present) (talk)	Merge
105		Criticism of libertarianism (talk)	Wikify
75		Anarchism in Russia (talk)	Wikify
84		Market fundamentalism (talk)	Wikify
6		ULMA Architectural Solutions (talk)	Orphan
4		Agroterra (talk)	Orphan
3		People's Council of West Kurdistan (talk)	Orphan
9		BBC Romanian (talk)	Stub
277		SNAC (talk)	Stub
51		Financial Revolution (talk)	Stub
33		Kurdish Supreme Committee (talk)	Stub
5		Bahar, Iran (talk)	Stub
50		Makhnovism (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:37, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! for answering my question. Kpgjhpjm (talk) 16:37, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Septrillion (talk) 16:40, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have left a question on the teahouse in 'draft' , please anwser it.Kpgjhpjm (talk) 13:16, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. But please be patient. Septrillion (talk) 13:35, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]