Packaging C‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Packaging, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of containers, packaging, and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PackagingWikipedia:WikiProject PackagingTemplate:WikiProject PackagingContainers C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Metalworking C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Materials Unassessed

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Materials, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Materials on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaterialsWikipedia:WikiProject MaterialsTemplate:WikiProject MaterialsMaterials ??? This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Is this link correct ? Refrigerator magnet seems to be another thing (a decoration) than the purpose of this article.

--AXRL (talk) 17:28, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Refrigerator magnets have magnets and are commonplace and therefore accessible for testing. The point is that thin sheets of aluminum do not significantly attenuate a static magnetic field. Glrx (talk) 00:04, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This sentence is no more present on the article. --AXRL (talk) 14:42, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Linking to Reynolds Wrap is a surprise, because the words do not appear in the article.  I'm thinking of adding a "See also":
_* Reynolds Metals for coverage of the trademark Reynolds Wrap
Unscintillating (talk) 03:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aluminium foil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141021084635/http://www.reynoldskitchens.com/media/10246730/reynolds_wrap_faq.pdf to http://www.reynoldskitchens.com/media/10246730/reynolds_wrap_faq.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:50, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]