Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polyemmory: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m →[[Polyemmory]]: clarification |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Protologism - no Google hits at all, no verification offered. PROD was removed, so nominating here. [[User:Calair|Calair]] 01:03, 6 October 2006 (UTC) |
Protologism - no Google hits at all, no verification offered. PROD was removed, so nominating here. [[User:Calair|Calair]] 01:03, 6 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
* '''Delete''' (nominator vote). Googling for 'polyemory' (one 'm') produces seven hits, most or all of them misspellings of [[polyamory]]. Note also the first version of the page, which made specific and untrue claims about e.g. UK law, which does not speak well for accuracy of the rest of it. --[[User:Calair|Calair]] 01:10, 6 October 2006 (UTC) |
* '''Delete''' (nominator vote). Googling for 'polyemory' (one 'm') produces seven hits, most or all of them misspellings of [[polyamory]]. Note also the first version of the page, which made specific and untrue claims about e.g. UK law, which does not speak well for accuracy of the rest of it. --[[User:Calair|Calair]] 01:10, 6 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Arbustoo|Arbusto]] 01:17, 6 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:17, 6 October 2006
Protologism - no Google hits at all, no verification offered. PROD was removed, so nominating here. Calair 01:03, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete (nominator vote). Googling for 'polyemory' (one 'm') produces seven hits, most or all of them misspellings of polyamory. Note also the first version of the page, which made specific and untrue claims about e.g. UK law, which does not speak well for accuracy of the rest of it. --Calair 01:10, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Arbusto 01:17, 6 October 2006 (UTC)