Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

User talk:Mowster: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
MediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)
Tag: MassMessage delivery
Neutrality (talk | contribs)
Reliable sources: new section
Line 50: Line 50:
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/18&oldid=750574659 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/18&oldid=750574659 -->

== Reliable sources ==

Re your edit [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Death_of_Raymond_Zack&type=revision&diff=795842432&oldid=791970588 here]:

# Please don't mark reverts or other major edits as "minor edits."
# None of these cited sources is reliable (see [[WP:RS]]):
::*One is an undergraduate blog post created as part of a class project.
::*Another is a web forum.
::*The last is an opinion piece by an obscure commentator in a fringe-y blog.

None of these are usable. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality]]<sup>[[User talk:Neutrality|talk]]</sup> 20:42, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:42, 16 August 2017

"And the fraud of wikipedia goes on..."

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/07/financial/f115701S13.DTL Mowster 20:52, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Mysterious and unknowable rules"

There are no mysterious and unknowable rules. Just take a look at WP:CSD, WP:NOTABILITY, WP:V, WP:RS, WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC, etc. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:06, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Or just actually read the notes on the deletion discussion page, and follow the link to Wikipedia:Deletion review. Argyriou (talk) 21:33, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Attn interested readers: Prior to quitting, this guy actually got some of his Wikipedia gripes printed in the local paper!

http://eastbayexpress.com/Issues/2006-11-22/news/watercooler.html

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Margaret McNamara may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • <ref>[http://www.mmmf-grants.org/margaret-mcnamara-story.html Margaret McNamara Memorial Fund]]</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:09, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stewart Chen (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alameda. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stewart Chen (politician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stewart Chen (politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stewart Chen (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nat Gertler (talk) 04:44, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Death of Raymond Zack requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 03:03, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mowster. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Re your edit here:

  1. Please don't mark reverts or other major edits as "minor edits."
  2. None of these cited sources is reliable (see WP:RS):
  • One is an undergraduate blog post created as part of a class project.
  • Another is a web forum.
  • The last is an opinion piece by an obscure commentator in a fringe-y blog.

None of these are usable. Neutralitytalk 20:42, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]