Television C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why is The Roadhouse referred to in the article as "Bang Bang Bar"? Yes, I know about the neon sign but that bar has always been referred to as "The Roadhouse" by everyone (literally, everyone in the series). JanBielawski (talk) 21:33, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Easy answer. The Bang Bang Bar happens to be a roadhouse (see Roadhouse (facility). As it's the only roadhouse in town, there's no real need for locals to call it by its proper name.

Why the new article? It's like the new season of The X-Files. This is not a separate series, it's just a new season. --Batman tas (talk) 22:26, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's all very confusing. Imdb is also treating it as a separate show-http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4093826/. This article, which comes from a site called digitalspy.com says it's going to be a new season-http://www.digitalspy.com/tv/twin-peaks/feature/a601713/twin-peaks-returns-the-cast-the-plot-the-characters-and-everything-you-need-to-know-about-season-3/, though I'm not sure if this info is in any way reliable. It could end up being a miniseries. It's possible.Radiohist (talk) 18:25, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We really have no idea whether it's going to be a season or a separate series. David Lynch is being intentionally very quiet about the entire thing, even down to who's playing whom (aside from returning actors). Considering how Lynch has filmed this project (basically as one massive movie), it's looking like it'll be a standalone miniseries or a conclusion to the cliffhangers the second season left behind. Either way, we are 100% certain that we're not sure what direction Lynch and Frost will take, and won't have many clues until the Secret History book release in mid-October. Joethetimelord (talk) 23:00, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We can have articles for specific seasons of television if there's enough information to fill them and editors who care enough to write them. I think the issue here is that this article's called Twin Peaks (2017 TV series) rather than Twin Peaks (season 3). —Flax5 13:18, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Page should be Twin Peaks (season 3). It's not a spinoff, reboot, etc. It has same characters with same actors, themes, and even reminds us of the "25 years" tie-in. — Wyliepedia 14:34, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's warranted because it's not just a next season, it's a new season after 25 years. This is not very common, to say the least. JanBielawski (talk) 21:30, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is it confirmed which characters the returning actors will play? Sheryl Lee played also Maddy Ferguson in original series, although the character died in the series. Anyway she is not only returning actor who's character died in original series. --188.67.86.85 (talk) 21:13, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It appears the title of this is Twin Peaks: The Return per the Showtime website. Should we move the article under that name instead? Thoughts? Drovethrughosts (talk) 13:19, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The phrasing here isn't really clear, but I think this page might just be saying that "The Return" is the name of the two-part premiere. Either way, we should find out pretty soon. —Flax5 15:34, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's true it's not completely clear. However, (to put my detective cap on) The Return is the title on the tab for this "season" on the website under "Episode Guide", like season 1 and 2. "Parts 1 & 2" is in the spot where the episode titles go while "Twin Peaks The Return" is in the spot where season/episode numbers go; just compare it to another episode page on the website here. Anyway, we should know soon enough. :) Drovethrughosts (talk) 20:05, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There's only one thing for certain - there will be some damn fine coffee. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 08:35, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Frost said it's simply Twin Peaks: https://twitter.com/mfrost11/status/850055977609056257 - MrBelpitsLegs (talk) 03:34, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The source for Naomi Watts being in the cast is this article from Deadline. How reliable is this publication or the author of the story? The article starts with "I have learned that Naomi Watts is the latest big name..." To me it just feels unreliable. Now the added problem is that this dates from more than a year ago, so there's no shortage of other online sources stating that Watts is part of the cast, but I suspect they've all used the same base information to proliferate this story. I appreciate this will be cleared up one way or another in a month or so when the series starts, but I'm seeking people's opinions about this. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 10:25, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deadline.com is pretty much the most reliable online source for TV/entertainment news. They seem to break news or have exclusives more than any other outlet, especially when it comes to casting. As for "I have learned...", that's simply the writing style of the journalist; because that's her job, to acquire insider information. Drovethrughosts (talk) 12:29, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks DTG. I've seen the site used as a source before (I've probably used it myself from time to time), but just wanted to check. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:34, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Someone attempts to kidnap a girl t the Roadhouse. Looks like this part is missing in the description of an episode. Is that right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.76.108.116 (talk) 02:01, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Horne grabs and threatens her but it's not a kidnapping attempt. If it winds up being important to the plot, it can go in, but it seems to just be showing what a nasty piece of work he is. --Canley (talk) 05:20, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]