Why would every celeb have some kinda icon on them? Clan rHrN

Hey Clan! Remember our dA agreement?Ianthegecko 02:06, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Clan rHrN, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  - Lucky 6.9 18:18, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I welcome you to talk in my talk page anytime. Sincerely,Clan rHrN 18:51, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

May I find out if the person on the Wikipedia named Hilary Duff IS the real Hilary Duff? Nevermind my making-fun-of-Eminem title. rHrN

It's highly doubtful. --Mandy (yes, THAT Mandy)

Of course. Successful teenage popstars often are extremely interested in online encyclopedias. Tokakeke 22:30, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add articles about your gaming clans. They will be deleted. DJ Clayworth 18:38, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add your name to lists of people, as you are not a prominent figure. -Lunar Jesters _(talk) 22:19, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Geg 21:32, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Clan rHrN!

I noted that you said on User:Clan rHrN/Psycho Bonus Stage that "You have no right to delete this since it is attached to my User page." Please note, however, that Wikipedia is not a free hosting site; you are thus limited in what you can post by Wikipedia policy. In addition, because of Wikipedia's personal attacks policy, you should avoid insulting others anywhere on Wikipedia. Thanks, and happy editing! -- Where 22:46, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the past, the people I have "attacked" have attacked me first and they are also vandalising my User page, but hiding themselves using anonyomus IPs. Clan rHrN 00:11, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clan, if you want to share a story you wrote on the Internet, please don't do it on Wikipedia. I suggest your deviation-void dA page. Ianthegecko 04:35, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Mr. Gecko, I dislike deviantART because of the vicious snobs named Nintipup and Myrrh-equals-sexy. Also, these vicious snobs also decide to spam my journal entries. Clan rHrN 17:35, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then why do you have an account there? Wikipedia is not for putting up your own fanfics. Ianthegecko 18:21, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

This is not a fanfiction. That was actual history about myself in my adventures on the Internet. All of what I have typed is 100% accurate. Clan rHrN 18:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedians have their own user pages, but they may be used only to present information relevant to working on the encyclopedia.-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_free_host.2C_blog.2C_webspace_provider_or_social_networking_site"Wikipedia is not a free hosting site. Ianthegecko 20:07, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

You are clearly in violation of [Wikipedia policy]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ianthegecko (talk • contribs)

I reported Ianthegecko to WP:AIV. I have not looked at the appropriateness of your User page (there seems to be some controversy), but I do know that vandalizing as certain parties have done is not the way to handle it. -Seidenstud 00:14, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I did not vandalize his page; I just notified him of Wikipedia policy on his user page. Ianthegecko 00:23, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

As a result of my reporting him to WP:AIV, Ianthegecko as been blocked for vandalizing your page. However, you really ought to look carefully at Wikipedia is not a free hosting site and see which content on your user page belongs and which does not. Anything that does not belong here can be transferred to a Free web hosting service. Doing so will help you avoid being harassed (both legitimately/appropriately and not) in the future. Good luck! If you need help with this or anything else, feel free to contact me. -Seidenstud 01:34, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thank you and I'll take your warning. Clan rHrN 15:20, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clan, that is the best work of comedic fiction I have ever read! Your page is a riot and a half. You need to get that published, so everyone can read it and laugh, regardless of whether they have Teh Intarnets or not.

However, I believe you forgot the part about oongawasquid. Did you cut that out because you didn't find it funny enough? Because I thought it was hilarious.

~Shippinator Mandy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.57.161.83 (talk • contribs)

I thank you for the polite comment. However, hilarious or not, all of that was 100% accurate and is to show the admins (of Wikipedia) my past as so they do not believe the Noid or some other liar. As for Oongawasquid, I have added him and Kingdra onto the acquaintances, simply because it is accurate and I do not think I'll find them here. If that's the case... Clan rHrN 15:19, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop the personal attacks on your user page. Calling people "faggots", "pedophiles", etc goes against wikipedia's rules. Don't get banned. 68.62.229.65 06:11, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I got no problems with your user page now, Clan.. You removed the personal attacks, and that was all I asked. As far as I'm concerned, you're ok now. Thank you. 68.62.229.65 06:37, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Miscellany for deletion notices from your user page. The notices is needed to establish community consensus about the status of your user page, and removing it is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of your user page, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Removing the box does not stop the discussion, which is taking place here. Kimchi.sg 21:27, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, since I never vandalise and I don't spam, I guess I'll leave it there for decoration. I'd like to point out I'm not using my User page as a publishing site, and I am not necessarily attacking other Users personally. One's opinion leads to another. Clan rHrN 21:47, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I have closed the MfD discussion on your userpage. The result was to keep the current page version, but delete the offensive content in the history, and I have done so. Best wishes, Xoloz 16:54, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I had no idea what Asperger's Syndrome was till I read the wiki.. that means you have autism right? That sucks.. Sorry for being so mean to you :) -Steven ELSR... Yes... ELSR

I forgive you. It's not AN autism, but it is somewhat related to autism. I pity da foo who's stupid enough to not believe me. Clan rHrN 01:11, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clan rulez 65.27.211.52 19:38, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks... Clan rHrN 14:35, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what you are taking about on your user page but that appears to be personal attacks on other users. I would ask that you please remove the names you have listed. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 14:53, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am indicating who are Phil Argus' sockpuppets so you can stop him. He is a troll who likes trolling things. He has actually mind-controlled the people I've listed. Clan rHrN 14:56, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see you ave removed them. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 15:11, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article makes clan out to be a great guy. Wikipedia is not a place for opinions. It should be NEUTRAl! All this "falsely accused" nosense has to stop! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.105.169.239 (talk • contribs)

And clan- do not delete this. Disscussion pages are not yours to control. You cannot delete something just because you don't want it to be there.

You have no right to delete this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Funkstar (talk • contribs)

You know he's gonna delete it anyway. But lemme say this, Clan: Every proclamation that someone hates you is not spam. The controversy section is being needlessly deleted because you wish to be the guy you know you aren't. Sorry Clan, but I just needed to say this. _"Psychosis"^usertalk 21:57, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clan, please stop deleting comments from your talk page. I've looked through the history, and every single one that showed you in a negative light, plus one formal vandalism warning and multiple nonformalised warnings about policy violations, was removed, often with "I don't like spam" or "Stop with the vandalism" (or similar) as the edit summary.

In any case, I have restored all the deleted remarks save for the personal attacks (policy states that you are free to delete those).

I know you're going to delete this comment too, so let me say one thing first: Your user talk page is not yours to control, and cherry-picking its content so that you will be shown in a positive light is a violation of Wikipedia:Vandalism.

If you simply wish your talk page to be short and/or uncluttered, may I suggest an archive instead? That preserves all the discussions without them needing to appear on your main Talk page.

Literality 19:15, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Litereality, mostly I can indicate which ones are personal attacks. I don't like spam on MY talk page. Since it is MY talk page I feel I can do whatever I want with it. Clan rHrN 11:33, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And WikiPedia belongs to WikiPedia, so ultimately THEY can decide what stays and what doesn't. If you seriously need to vent your anger and stuff at things, may I suggest LiveJournal, or Vox, or something else? Hey, that reminds me...Googlepages might do for some of this stuff. If you want I can help you set it up. _"Psychosis"^usertalk 11:55, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing warnings of policy violations from your talk page is considered to be vandalism, even if there's no specific policy regarding the removal of negative but non-attack remarks. Please do not do this again. Schizophrenicsalmon 00:03, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, I'd advise you to actually read Wikipedia's article on personal attacks before declaring negative remarks to be "personal attacks". Same for [[spam (electronic}|spam]]. Literality 02:22, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You should have a look at this. _"Psychosis"^usertalk 12:54, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What of his was deleted that he'd want back? Schizophrenicsalmon 13:36, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If I didn't know any better, his ability to talk about whatever he wanted without fear of being reverted. :roll: _"Psychosis"^usertalk 13:50, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seems a bit of an ironic statement, since he seems very interested in censoring this page to make himself look better. Literality 00:26, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the reverts are getting outta control guys. (That includes you, Mr. I-Don't-Like-Spam) Clan, I recommend reading that thing I linked to earlier. Besides, it's official Wikipedia policy, so you should read up. _"Psychosis"^usertalk 13:50, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This really belonged here, although Clan's certainly more likely to see it on the main userpage. Literality 02:18, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clan, just wanted to explain some things to you:

• Just because some people accuse you of things doesn't make them right. It could be as true as it isn't. "Falsely" can be removed here.
• To me, anyway, I reckon WP would consider your allies/neutrals/enemies list as a kind of personal attack. That was why it was removed.
• As with Coca Cola and Microsoft, there is some controversy surrounding you. That is why it is there.

Just wanted to get some things through to you. :)
_"Psychosis"^{user[[User talk:===PsYchOsIs===|talk]]} 01:12, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

I am not your allie

I belong in neutral. --Extremejon 19:42, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Allies/Neutrals/Enemies/Mutual Enemies section should be removed

Personal attackage. So yeah, you might wanna remove it. ;) _"Psychosis"^usertalk 01:02, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Hannah is not your Ally. She even called you a faggot that several times in the chat.