User talk:My very best wishes: Difference between revisions
Line 140: | Line 140: | ||
:::Didn't get a reply at the article's talk page so I thought I come directly here. As for the new version, I did propose it a few days ago at the article's talk page (with new sources). Check it out. It was approved by some editors, but again rejected by Marek. I then proposed to Volunteer Marek that we remove the mention of the soldier's bodies, but we leave the text (as I suggested to you above) on the reported civilian deaths. But (for whatever reason) he said he doubts the reliability of the source. The source being AFP in this case, which is considered far and wide a reliable one. Anyway could you at least comment on these reliable secondary sources at the article's talk page and I will also write this text/version there as well? And you can just say if you approve or disapprove the new text. [[User:EkoGraf|EkoGraf]] ([[User talk:EkoGraf|talk]]) 16:08, 7 May 2017 (UTC) |
:::Didn't get a reply at the article's talk page so I thought I come directly here. As for the new version, I did propose it a few days ago at the article's talk page (with new sources). Check it out. It was approved by some editors, but again rejected by Marek. I then proposed to Volunteer Marek that we remove the mention of the soldier's bodies, but we leave the text (as I suggested to you above) on the reported civilian deaths. But (for whatever reason) he said he doubts the reliability of the source. The source being AFP in this case, which is considered far and wide a reliable one. Anyway could you at least comment on these reliable secondary sources at the article's talk page and I will also write this text/version there as well? And you can just say if you approve or disapprove the new text. [[User:EkoGraf|EkoGraf]] ([[User talk:EkoGraf|talk]]) 16:08, 7 May 2017 (UTC) |
||
::::OK, I will check these sources if I have more time. Too busy with my work right now. [[User:My very best wishes|My very best wishes]] ([[User talk:My very best wishes#top|talk]]) 00:15, 8 May 2017 (UTC) |
::::OK, I will check these sources if I have more time. Too busy with my work right now. [[User:My very best wishes|My very best wishes]] ([[User talk:My very best wishes#top|talk]]) 00:15, 8 May 2017 (UTC) |
||
:::::Thank you. I also cited (beside AFP and Deutsche Welle) Middle East Eye as well. Maybe you could also make a proposition on the wording of the text if you think there is still room for changes. PS Sorry for the bother, |
:::::Thank you. I also cited (beside AFP and Deutsche Welle) Middle East Eye as well. Maybe you could also make a proposition on the wording of the text if you think there is still room for changes. PS Sorry for the bother, simply trying to find a compromise solution. [[User:EkoGraf|EkoGraf]] ([[User talk:EkoGraf|talk]]) 03:16, 8 May 2017 (UTC) |
||
simply trying to find a compromise solution. [[User:EkoGraf|EkoGraf]] ([[User talk:EkoGraf|talk]]) 03:16, 8 May 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:24, 8 May 2017
Yo Ho Ho
- Thank you! Let's hope for the best, but the future does not look good. Here is what I really think:
Epigraph: "Отдалась лихому супостату" (Voloshin)
Что ж ты, моя Родина несчастная,
Обернулась Бабою-Ягой -
Не Людмилой, пленницей прекрасною,
А Наиной с ядерной клюкой?
Буками и Градами хрипящая,
В пепле отвратительных побед,
Ты - не мать, не девица гулящая,
А с зубами баба-людоед.
Ты сожрала бедную Абхазию,
Крымский полуостров и Донбасс.
Ты глотала целую Евразию,
Исполняя сталинский наказ.
Ты не помнишь собственной Истории,
Жжет шовинистический угар.
Ты сжигаешь жизни в крематории,
Где шурует Путлер-кочегар.
Ты взвинтила ложью до истерики
Своего Ивана-дурака,
И уже на выборы в Америке
Тянется костлявая рука…
9/29/2016
На зловещих часах
Приближается полночь -
Целый мир на весах
Призывает на помощь.
Торжествуют Игил
И Осама Бен Ладен:
Восстает из могил
Президент Ку-клукс-кладен.
Все подвластно eму.
Он страну обезглавил.
В белоснежном дому
Будет жить Желтый Дьявол[1].
Будут в небе кружить
Смертоносные птицы,
Будут бомбы крушить
Города и больницы,
Будут Штаты "Совком" -
Как спланировал Путин:
Вашингтонский обком
И Нью-Йоркский Распутин.
11/18/2016
- ^ Reference to the “The City of Yellow Devil” by Maksim Gorky.
- They represent my own vision of the future, also. The second poem, in particular, sent chills through me. Joy to the world. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:42, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
TellsHey MVBW, just wanted to drop a quick note about the verb "to tell." In this edit [1] you write, "...Both segments tell that political establishment..." I know exactly what you're communicating. But, I think instead of "tell" you want to use one of these verbs:
Really, "tell" is used infrequently, and in very specific contexts: when one person is communicating a specific piece of information directly to one or a number of others. I thought I'd just mention all this because your use of the verb "to tell" is the only indicator, besides your userbox, that you're not a native English speaker. Hope you don't mind my writing this here! Not meant as a jibe at all. Best, Darouet (talk) 22:23, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Дорогой товарищ Жутин,
Идут мимо нас поколенья,
|
- I can not be very active for privacy and other reasons. However, please post any Wikipedia-related comments or questions here. I will read and probably respond later. My very best wishes (talk) 17:57, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Story on government allegation of rebel executions
AFP, Deutsche Welle (reliable sources) and a dozen other mainstream media outlets (not connected to the government) that I linked at the battle's talk page reported on the AFP's story of the government's allegation of finding 21 civilians executed by the rebels. The text I propose, cited to these sources, would go like this - State media claimed the Army had found the bodies of 21 executed civilians in rebel prisons, citing the head of Aleppo's forensic unit Zaher Hajjo. The Russian defence ministry also reported the execution of dozens of people by the rebels. The pro-opposition activist group the SOHR confirmed bodies had been found in the streets but could not specify how they were killed.[2][3][4] EkoGraf (talk) 15:54, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- I would say this falls under the WP:SECONDARY since we would be using reliable secondary sources who are talking about that specific story. And we wouldn't be using the primary source (which is the state media). EkoGraf (talk) 15:58, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- I am not sure why you post here. Old version of the paragraph was poorly written and poorly sourced, hence it was correct removal [5]. If it can be written and sourced better, this is fine. Please suggest new version and discuss it with others on article talk page. Thank you, My very best wishes (talk) 16:00, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Didn't get a reply at the article's talk page so I thought I come directly here. As for the new version, I did propose it a few days ago at the article's talk page (with new sources). Check it out. It was approved by some editors, but again rejected by Marek. I then proposed to Volunteer Marek that we remove the mention of the soldier's bodies, but we leave the text (as I suggested to you above) on the reported civilian deaths. But (for whatever reason) he said he doubts the reliability of the source. The source being AFP in this case, which is considered far and wide a reliable one. Anyway could you at least comment on these reliable secondary sources at the article's talk page and I will also write this text/version there as well? And you can just say if you approve or disapprove the new text. EkoGraf (talk) 16:08, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- OK, I will check these sources if I have more time. Too busy with my work right now. My very best wishes (talk) 00:15, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you. I also cited (beside AFP and Deutsche Welle) Middle East Eye as well. Maybe you could also make a proposition on the wording of the text if you think there is still room for changes. PS Sorry for the bother, simply trying to find a compromise solution. EkoGraf (talk) 03:16, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- OK, I will check these sources if I have more time. Too busy with my work right now. My very best wishes (talk) 00:15, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Didn't get a reply at the article's talk page so I thought I come directly here. As for the new version, I did propose it a few days ago at the article's talk page (with new sources). Check it out. It was approved by some editors, but again rejected by Marek. I then proposed to Volunteer Marek that we remove the mention of the soldier's bodies, but we leave the text (as I suggested to you above) on the reported civilian deaths. But (for whatever reason) he said he doubts the reliability of the source. The source being AFP in this case, which is considered far and wide a reliable one. Anyway could you at least comment on these reliable secondary sources at the article's talk page and I will also write this text/version there as well? And you can just say if you approve or disapprove the new text. EkoGraf (talk) 16:08, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- I am not sure why you post here. Old version of the paragraph was poorly written and poorly sourced, hence it was correct removal [5]. If it can be written and sourced better, this is fine. Please suggest new version and discuss it with others on article talk page. Thank you, My very best wishes (talk) 16:00, 7 May 2017 (UTC)